Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

SpaceX is targeting Thursday, April 27 at 6:40 a.m. PT (13:40 UTC) for a Falcon 9 launch of 46 Starlink satellites to low-Earth orbit from Space Launch Complex 4 East (SLC-4E) at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California.

The first stage booster supporting this mission previously launched Crew-1, Crew-2, SXM-8, CRS-23, IXPE, Transporter-4, Transporter-5, Globalstar FM15, ISI EROS C-3 and three Starlink missions. Following stage separation, Falcon 9’s first stage will land on the Of Course I Still Love You droneship stationed in the Pacific Ocean.

A live webcast of this mission will begin about five minutes prior to liftoff.

SpaceX is targeting Thursday, April 27 at 6:40 a.m. PT (13:40 UTC) for a Falcon 9 launch of 46 Starlink satellites to low-Earth orbit from Space Launch Complex 4 East (SLC-4E) at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. The first stage booster supporting this mission previously launched Crew-1, Crew-2, SXM-8, CRS-23, IXPE, Transporter-4, Transporter-5, Globalstar FM15, ISI EROS C-3 and three Starlink missions. Following stage separation, Falcon 9’s first stage will land on the Of Course I Still Love You droneship stationed in the Pacific Ocean. A live webcast of this mission will begin about five minutes prior to liftoff.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (18).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Did you read about any of the other operations?

Operation Fishbowl was an attempt to break the firmament.

FYI, you're not going to find the answers on ((( wikipedia )))

[–] • 0 pt

No, I didn't read about any of the other operations. When you say things like space is fake and gay over and over in space related threads, you are relegated to a flat Earther status by many, and the onus is on you to explain your absurd comment, not on us to try to better understand. Operation Fishbowl was atmospheric thermonuclear testing, with a specific eye towards understanding and developing theories for EMP generation at different altitudes and different yields. While you and I may agree on some things like FBI corruption or Poal being a great place for free speech, it appears we have different standards when it comes to science and engineering!

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

and the onus is on you to explain your absurd comment,

The onus is on you to prove it's a ball.

My point is that you haven't. No on has. "Except for the government".

it appears we have different standards when it comes to science and engineering

Correct. I require that something be testable in order to accept it as truth. You don't appear to follow that requirement.