Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

657

It is closer to Mars or the Sun, yet we have no satellites to study the Moon closer. We can put a rover on Mars, but never on the Moon. Strange, no?

It is closer to Mars or the Sun, yet we have no satellites to study the Moon closer. We can put a rover on Mars, but never on the Moon. Strange, no?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (48).
[–] • 0 pt

i didnt say it was impossible the original post did, the difference in mass would be the only possible thing i can think of to explain why the moon would not have satelittes. can you think of another possible explaination?

[–] • 0 pt

The original post did not say it was impossible. It (yes, incorrectly) said that there weren’t any and asked why.

So if we assume a hypothetical timeline in which there actually were no satellites orbiting the moon, we can say for a fact that the reason would not be because of gravity, because obviously the gravity situation is perfectly fine for satellites

[–] • 0 pt

Why haven't there been any satellites orbiting the Moon, or any rovers there?

dude read the fucking title

[–] • 0 pt

Can you read? I said the title incorrectly stated that there aren’t satellites. The title does NOT say that satellites are impossible