FTA:
If this happens, good science will demand that climate models be revised to increase the impact of the Sun’s variability.
How likely do you that is?
lol "good science", is that the same science that believes evolution as fact, despite it not being provable under the scientific method?
I think it's inevitable. The sun is the main influencer of the global climate. To have the best climate models, one must factor in the sun as a core vairant. But, it doesn't jive with the current "global warming AHHH" propaganda, so it may take awhile to be widely adopted.
I wasn't taught that evolution was settled fact when I went to school. I was taught that it was the most likely way in which we came about.
But yeah, at this point AGW propaganda is far more important than any science.
I'm talking more about the scientific community at large. In college STEM/the professional sciences, they claim it as fact. I've heard some claim that Evolution is a fact, and the theory of evolution is our attempt at explaining that fact. Plus, the evolution science community will hunt down anyone in the public school system who so much as suggest evolution is incorrect. Hence, why I don't have much respect for those kinds of people. I'm totally fine with people believing in evolution, just so long as they admit it's a faith baed belief, and not based in science fact--I've never come across anyone who believes in evolution and has admitted this, I'm sure they are out there.
Btw, what does the "A" in AGW mean? Artificial?
(post is archived)