Watch: South African Black Party Chants 'Kill The Boer (White), Kill The Farmer' | "EFF members are suspected in the past of engaging in attacks on white owned farms and murdering farmers..."

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Hey Poal. OK, I live in this shithole 3rd world country.

The EFF is excepsionally racist by nature, their leader loves psycing up his black followers by having this song about killing all white people, we as white people are in such a minority, but the EFF is still shit scared of us.

It is known that the EFF leader gave his minions jamming equipment, as the Boere is a very tight knit community, they stand together, but with no comms they are killed off in very inhuman ways.

In fact, this weekend there was another farm attack, killing the farmer, and beating his wife where she is now fighting for her life in ICU.

The news here do not report on farm attacks at all, the black government for obvious reasons say we are over reacting.

Basically, the blacks tend to attack old defenseless farmers, people that many are 70 years and older, this is their tactic, unable to attack people of their own age, they go after the old, the blacks burn these people with irons, boiling water, hit these old people over the head with pipes, rape the grannies, kill the children, the dogs, the pigs whatever.

You have NO IDEA how we are being exterminated, and when you say something, you are a racist, a black people hater, an apartheid lover.

You know, we never grew up hating, but it is clear, we should've.

It is also clear, the South African black, if they can't burn, rape it or steal it, as long as you cannot have it.

link

[–] • 1 pt

Here "we" know

We don't know all the details, and for the vast majority of us we certainly aren't living it on the ground, but we do know that not only MSM are largely not reporting on this phenomenon, but also that they do everything under the sun to deny its very existence and pretend this is just a baseless racist-right-wing-conspiracy-theory that didn't happen

And many here also believe that the USA is just a few decades behind SA, and I also believe that this is how it ends ultimately, with the overall diversishit program through mass immigration to infinity

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/02/24/aristotle-on-immigration-diversity-and-democracy/

"Aristotle is greatly concerned with the preservation of civil peace in the city-state. One of the most common causes of “faction” and civil war, he says, was the unhappy consequences of unassimilated immigration and the consequent diversity. Aristotle’s prose is perfectly clear:

>Heterogeneity of stocks may lead to faction – at any rate until they have had time to assimilate. A city cannot be constituted from any chance collection of people, or in any chance period of time. Most of the cities which have admitted settlers, either at the time of their foundation or later, have been troubled by faction. For example, the Achaeans joined with settlers from Troezen in founding Sybaris, but expelled them when their own numbers increased; and this involved their city in a curse. At Thurii the Sybarites quarreled with the other settlers who had joined them in its colonization; they demanded special privileges, on the ground that they were the owners of the territory, and were driven out of the colony. At Byzantium the later settlers were detected in a conspiracy against the original colonists, and were expelled by force; and a similar expulsion befell the exiles from Chios who were admitted to Antissa by the original colonists. At Zancle, on the other hand, the original colonists were themselves expelled by the Samians whom they admitted. At Apollonia, on the Black Sea, factional conflict was caused by the introduction of new settlers; at Syracuse the conferring of civic rights on aliens and mercenaries, at the end of the period of the tyrants, led to sedition and civil war; and at Amphipolis the original citizens, after admitting Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by the colonists they had admitted. (1303A13)

Thus, immigration of different peoples was a common source of conflict, often leading to civil war and concluding with the ethnic cleansing of either the native peoples or the invaders."

Here "we" know We don't know all the details, and for the vast majority of us we certainly aren't living it on the ground, but we do know that not only MSM are largely not reporting on this phenomenon, but also that they do everything under the sun to deny its very existence and pretend this is just a baseless racist-right-wing-conspiracy-theory that didn't happen And many here also believe that the USA is just a few decades behind SA, and I also believe that this is how it ends ultimately, with the overall diversishit program through mass immigration to infinity https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/02/24/aristotle-on-immigration-diversity-and-democracy/ "Aristotle is greatly concerned with the preservation of civil peace in the city-state. One of the most common causes of “faction” and civil war, he says, was the unhappy consequences of unassimilated immigration and the consequent diversity. Aristotle’s prose is perfectly clear: >>Heterogeneity of stocks may lead to faction – at any rate until they have had time to assimilate. A city cannot be constituted from any chance collection of people, or in any chance period of time. Most of the cities which have admitted settlers, either at the time of their foundation or later, have been troubled by faction. For example, the Achaeans joined with settlers from Troezen in founding Sybaris, but expelled them when their own numbers increased; and this involved their city in a curse. At Thurii the Sybarites quarreled with the other settlers who had joined them in its colonization; they demanded special privileges, on the ground that they were the owners of the territory, and were driven out of the colony. At Byzantium the later settlers were detected in a conspiracy against the original colonists, and were expelled by force; and a similar expulsion befell the exiles from Chios who were admitted to Antissa by the original colonists. At Zancle, on the other hand, the original colonists were themselves expelled by the Samians whom they admitted. At Apollonia, on the Black Sea, factional conflict was caused by the introduction of new settlers; at Syracuse the conferring of civic rights on aliens and mercenaries, at the end of the period of the tyrants, led to sedition and civil war; and at Amphipolis the original citizens, after admitting Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by the colonists they had admitted. (1303A13) Thus, immigration of different peoples was a common source of conflict, often leading to civil war and concluding with the ethnic cleansing of either the native peoples or the invaders."

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

"suspected"

link