Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

134

https://pleroma.nobodyhasthe.biz/main/all

https://discussions.app/

https://poa.st/

I don't know who owns these, but they all claim free speech.

https://pleroma.nobodyhasthe.biz/main/all https://discussions.app/ https://poa.st/ I don't know who owns these, but they all claim free speech.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (45).
[–] • 2 pts

Im not callin you dad. FIGHT ME

[–] • -1 pt

Why are you getting bent out of shape about drawings?

No victim, no crime. And it's a fucking jew argument to suggest that my defense of free speech means that I support the offensive material.

[–] • 2 pts

Homestly i was joking at first but you defending this shit is just gross. Please dont be a pedo defender

[–] • -2 pt (edited )

Loli isn't pedo. Loli is pictures and video cartoons. Loli is degenerate but isn't a crime. Pedo's victimize children. Pedo is a crime.

You can't claim "muh free speech" while banning legal speech. You are free to mute things you don't want to see. Hell, even most muh free speech sites let you block users.

Again, I didn't make the rules. But a real free speech site will let you recognize race, call out the jew, and yes, post loli. That's the test.

And hey, I like Poal. AOU is great. But Poal doesn't allow Loli, and that's okay. It's just not a true free speech site.

I'll also say this. True free speech sites that do allow loli just end up with a bunch of mild, certainly not Pedo, drawings and videos by a handful of users, easily muted, who are probably just testing the site for muh free speech. If they get too pedo-y, the other users usually push them right off their site without censorship.