WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

407

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

The 6% column is the CDC's revised number of infected vs reported. In other words, even with invalid PCR testing, the CDC can only confirm 6% of the reported as actually infected.

As for deaths, they simply moved deaths from other columns into the c19 column. The total year to year decadal death trend for the United states remains completely unchanged. Meanwhile we've apparently cured cancer, colds, flus, and pneumonia.

As for PCR testing, the tests are incorrectly used with oversampling. False positives can be higher than 80%. What's 20% * 6%? Since Biden, they reduced cycle counts to the correct number. Making them more accurate. However, the c19 PCR test actually tests for chains common to Corona (colds).

It's a hoax. There currently is no data to support any other claim. If it is real, they wouldn't need to manufacture data as they are confirmed doing.

[–] 0 pt

The total year to year decadal death trend for the United states remains completely unchanged. Meanwhile we've apparently cured cancer, colds, flus, and pneumonia.

This is the data I can't find. When I look up excess mortality rate all the official sources I see claim high percentages during covid. The numbers are adjusted seven ways to sunday, factoring in population numbers, ages of population, which is all necessary for having a useful estimate of the expected death rate to contrast the real death rate to, but unfortunately it makes it much harder to read. More convolution also makes numbers easier to massage, which I'm not ruling out, but I'm just too mentally exhausted to figure it out. I see the goyimtv folks saying its a hoax but they rarely provide good sources for their claims.

Anyone have any good sources for these claims of hoaxing?

[–] 0 pt

IIRC, the position is from going through each year to year report (document) and extracting the numbers.