Given how extreme and his reaction to opposition, I always pictured him as a schitzo rather than a shill. Like some guy living in his basement spending all day farming internet points and raging at anyone that opposed him,.
People like that are irrational and flip flop on mood and the personal highs and lows.
On the other hand, he used every common shill and propaganda tactic, including those common to glowniggers. He was unrelenting and dishonest. His every focus was demoralizing whites and inciting violence.
Which is more likely?
That was my read of it, I could see yours too. I guess I kinda pictured professional shills as being less emotional. His outbursts weren't effective.
The game of shilling isn't about the people involved. It's about the lurkers. For every person engaged, there can be dozens to thousands reading, evaluating, and deciding. The discussions are always about the lurkers.
Good shills created multiple personalities for specific tasks. Sometimes they play off each other. Other times they are for distraction, sliding, throw off scents, and even validation. Obviously for voting gaming and consensus cracking.
Let me give you an example of his behavior. He used to constantly tell people to "neck themselves" and he hopes they are thrown off a building.
I asked him if he was a homosexual. He viciously attacked me for asking. I pointed out it sounded like he was projecting his own fears and his overreaction conformed it. In that those are both deaths attributed to homosexuals in the middle east (hangings and thrown from building). As such, he is giving himself away. In the very least this implied he is in the middle east. He immediately changed his behavior.
Such a mystery, huh?
Not going to name anyone, but yeah there are certainly people who fit that criteria.
(post is archived)