disallowing speech that is illegal by law is the same as disallowing wrongthink
...
I explained exceptionally well and you're playing dumb. Either you are dumb, or you're a jew acting by way of pilpul. Pick one. This is a true dichotomy.
"Speech that is illegal" says it all right there. Could you explain to me what "shall make no law..." means in your own words?
Okay great. Then go to your local elementary school, call for vioelence, get arrested and contest the arrest and subsequent charged. You surely will get off with the first amendment which SCOTUS has ruled does not protect threats of violence.
What you're arguing could be used for child porn too with your logic. Are you arguing that child porn should be legal? Because it's not. And just like threats of violence, it is seen as illegal.
Clearly you're a fucking retard if you think violence against a child, which is what child porn is, is the same as speaking words. Absolutely retarded.
If I pay my goddamn taxes, i should be able to go into whatever school i want (in my area) and call some kids faggots.
Did anything Tallest said actually pertain to what you're talking about though? What acts of violence did he call for?
(post is archived)