WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

613

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I am curious, what would it take to be able to host a website that allow calls to violence? Or anything that breaks a standard TOS?

[–] 4 pts

infinite money. you have to be a "platform" as big as the likes of Facebook, google, etc.

"Calls to violence" on a website are illegal. The site owner is responsible. This is why you don't find sites which allow calls to violence, the webadmin will get jailed everytime.

If you're as big as facebook, you can hire a legal team to fight for your "right" as a "platform" -- under Section 230 -- to avoid liability for what is posted on your site.

[–] 3 pts

So all AOU has to do is be a jew, be a CIA asset, steal "his" idea from a college classmate, have the classmate disappeared, and release it with CIA power?

I think I got a basic synopsis of goybook there

[–] 2 pts

You got it!

[–] 1 pt

If people can sell drugs and pedo porn on Tor I'm sure we can have a free-for-all site there. There already are a few.

[–] 0 pt

no doubt. if you get crazy, you can build a decentralized social media site

that way, it's harder to legally blame anyone, because no one person is actually hosting the thing

If the site was offshore or if it keeps bouncing domains like pirate bay could that work?

[–] 2 pts

call to violence

Isn't a TOS thing. It's a legality thing.

18USC373

Making a forum site, which mandates arabic language. Then just communicate through google translate.

[–] 1 pt

These kinda exist if you look at Neinchan and Nanochan but they are mostly inactive. Really we all should be on onion addresses or zeronet, something like that.

https://poal.co/s/onion

[–] 0 pt

There's some activity on endchan and 16chan, but I know one of them bans and removes violence asap.