WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

782

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

infinite money. you have to be a "platform" as big as the likes of Facebook, google, etc.

"Calls to violence" on a website are illegal. The site owner is responsible. This is why you don't find sites which allow calls to violence, the webadmin will get jailed everytime.

If you're as big as facebook, you can hire a legal team to fight for your "right" as a "platform" -- under Section 230 -- to avoid liability for what is posted on your site.

[–] 3 pts

So all AOU has to do is be a jew, be a CIA asset, steal "his" idea from a college classmate, have the classmate disappeared, and release it with CIA power?

I think I got a basic synopsis of goybook there

[–] 2 pts

You got it!

[–] 0 pt

WTF

That's not difficult at all. Why is AOU infringing on my free speech to call for violence by not doing that and lobbying congress and such?

This is absurd!!!

Because of the fragility of this situation I must ruin the joke with this: I do not want to and I am not calling for any acts of violence. That was a joke in-line with the topic of this comment chain.

[–] 1 pt

If people can sell drugs and pedo porn on Tor I'm sure we can have a free-for-all site there. There already are a few.

[–] 0 pt

no doubt. if you get crazy, you can build a decentralized social media site

that way, it's harder to legally blame anyone, because no one person is actually hosting the thing

[–] 0 pt

I think we really need something like this before it's all up in smoke. I looked around but all that I found was half dead -chans. They certainly solve the gaming votes and alts problem though.

If the site was offshore or if it keeps bouncing domains like pirate bay could that work?