WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

378

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

I don't like that having them blocked means that they can't make comments on my posts. I think it hinders conversation. I only blocked users here because after seeing their posting habits I decided they were just making noise and not contributing anything of value to the site. However I still read their comments when they commented on my posts (I'd have to unroll them which wasn't a big deal).

[–] 1 pt

I think blocking is so middleschool. I never really felt the need to block anyone.

It's useful if someone is harassing you, but to block someone because you don't like their opinions or comments is pathetic.

[–] 0 pt

Ive been chronically harrassed by a few people. I ususally just harass them back. A couple of them ended up blocking me. Others got bored and stopped. One guy has been at it for a while but it sort of turned into a friendly game. Never blocked anyone on voat or here yet. But someone may change my mind about that.

I imagine you get some sexual harassment in particular from bad boys looking for attention. That has been my experience.

[–] 0 pt

BLOCKED!

[–] 0 pt

I didn't know it does that. It shouldn't. Are you sure they can't comment? Or do you mean you can't see when they comment?

Anticlutch had me blocked for awhile and I couldn't say a word to him.

[–] 0 pt

Which word?

[–] 0 pt

Yes. If I have someone blocked they can't reply directly to my posts or comments. They can however reply to other commenters on my posts.

As of right now I am aware of three users that have me blocked, two of them post a shit ton here: /u/Simo_Hayha , /u/Ex-Redditor

The other one is a Q-tard who can't figure out how to share links directly (bypassing site controls for posting duplicate links): /u/rickki6