Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

134

Socialism for one category of people is still socialism. Seizing the means of production for a war machine is still seizing the means of production.

Identitarian political farce using race as an idol, he was also a faggot pagan who wanted to revive demonic Germanic religion.

Socialism for one category of people is still socialism. Seizing the means of production for a war machine is still seizing the means of production. Identitarian political farce using race as an idol, he was also a faggot pagan who wanted to revive demonic Germanic religion.

(post is archived)

[–] • 9 pts

A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or his personal efficiency. Our adopted term "Socialist" has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of the individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against personal property; that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.

-Adolph Hitler, December 28, 1938

[–] • 7 pts

Okay Moshe.

[–] • -2 pt

You're more likely to be jewish for avoiding the question altogether.

Like a jew would.

[–] • 5 pts

It's clear you don't know shit about National Socialism and came from some cuckservative hellhole jew worshipping containment board like Patriots.win.

[–] • 5 pts

Lol. Very convincing.

[–] • -1 pt

'I am a socialist, and a very different kind of socialist from your rich friend Reventlow. I was once an ordinary workingman… But your kind of socialism is nothing but Marxism'

'Our adopted term 'Socialist' has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not'

-Adolf Hitler

[–] • 7 pts

He said it plain as day and yet you pilpul like a jew. He wasn't a Marxist and therefore not a communist. I also notice you cut off the rest the quote, which talks about how unlike JEWISH communism, National Socialism has no problem with private property.

[–] • 0 pt

I gave a single comment that destroyed my own initial argument, yet it took you and your friends here many comments to make a dent.

Hitler was a socialist in the eyes of many on the "right", no thanks to faggots like you who do an absolute shit job of defending the Fuhrer.

That's why you stay on containment boards like this, your arrogance cripples your ability to convince anyone.

10 more years of jewish subversion, maybe then the people will understand why they are hated. Cant count on shit like this to spread the truth.

[–] • -2 pt

He would be ashamed to have a crop like this fawning over his dead name.

You fawn over the past while your future is raped, and you dont even know what he believed.

It really is a tragedy to see what has happened to the German spirit, at the pleasure of the American spirit.

[–] • 7 pts

you dont even know what he believed.

This describes you much more than those of us who admire the one man who fought jewish child rapists.

[–] • 4 pts

>OY VEY GOYM PLEASE STOP THIS "WE ARE GONNA DO IT FOR REAL THIS TIME" NONSENSE. IT WAS HITLER WHO WAS A REAL COMMUNIST AND SATANIST, NOT US GOYM, NOT US. YOU GOTTA BELIEVE IT!

[–] • 0 pt

Hitler was a commie

Say you're a faggot w/ out saying you're a faggot

[–] • 0 pt

You weren't barred from owning a business in nazi germany, however in soviet russia you weren't allowed to own even a grocery store

Details matter, a lot

Besides, a free for all free market economy with zero .gov intervention, you don't want that, it might be required at one point or another, but that only and forever, it spells doom, that's how you get the standard oil of all things, that's how you get bezos owns the world.

You certainly don't want foreign entities to take over your economy essentially

[–] • 0 pt

The left destroyed Europe the last century with leftist: 1. communism 2. fascism 3. national socialism They are different and all on the political left.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Eric Striker:

Pigeonholing revolutionary nationalist ideas as Marxist or "not the true right" is a classic reactionary diversion when no rational argument against "Nazis" can be made. Who gives a shit what the true right is.

Figures like George Kennan and the neo-Monarchist writings by Hapsburgs restorationists declared Hitler and Mussolini communists because they did not respect "real right-wing ideas" like hereditary aristocracy or the infallibility of institutions like the Church. The Fascists and Nazis had a moderate opinion on the French Revolution and saw bourgeois values as effeminate and decadent, another supposed faux pas "on the right."

Whether they admit it or not, where they always drew the line of the "true right" vs secret communists masquerading as the right was on their subject's attitude towards race and Jews. Engelbert Dollfuss was to these commentators a "true conservative, a man of the right!" while Mussolini and Hitler were compared to Lenin and Stalin, "cut rate Bolsheviks!" said the wimp James Burnham.

Even if what historian A James Gregor says is true, that fascism and Nationalsocialism are revolutionary socialist movements that replace internationalism and class struggle with nationalism and race solidarity, so what? Were these movements empirically correct in how they identified problems and solutions or not? A discussion the low energy voices of reaction wish to dodge.

https://t.me/EricStrikerTRS/16124