The war in ukraine has created a fair bit of division on the right and divided the right from moderates/centrists, could this have been the primary goal of western powers to provoke the conflict at this moment in history?

1.4K

•

The enemy is sabotaging civilization and we're the only people preaching it's defense and making suggestions for it's bolster or repair even in a blind society that would make us inevitable, and in short order our ideology would root in the public consciousness and then bloom; this is the cyclical nature of ideology. The enemy empowers us, a few of the people in their multimillion dollar think tanks must have seen such an obvious and inevitable outcome on the horizon, how then would they plan to preempt our ideological blooming, to stick to the metaphor, plant another nearly identical ideology too close, salt the ground surrounding both and see them fight over resources, that implies this was all planned for a long time, in reality I think they have miss-stepped and are scuttling some of their plans to avoid creating more problems, they want to simplify the game a little.

Azov was meant to be a white bogey man to fuel their war on the white race and speed the west's collapse into a prison state. They would use planted assets in azov to create problems in america while funding azov in eastern Europe to create conflicts they could capitalize on by stealing children and enabling white slavery and hopefully direct this bogey man at russia while using the headlines at home to persecute whites. Instead jew funded azov will now fight the organic right for opinion space, it is like a schism in a young religion, the fractures will spread, and the whole squabble looks gross to anyone disinclined to learn the details and wards them off when before they might have been disillusioned enough with their old religion to convert, and now see an ugly slap fight that doesn't look suitable to guide them.

There was a nigh unwavering memetic unity in rightwing spaces prior to the ukraine conflict, it's many facets and moving parts have created enough nuance to put many people at different ends of the table from one another where once they all sat on the same side, this fractious posture is solely an issue for the right, and this is what I'm saying may have been the point of provoking the conflict at this time, this conflict was always going to metastasize into something worse the only question was when, and it seems the west did everything to ensure the answer was now. The money pumped into azov and the right in ukraine invigorated their online presence and made them a staple fixture in the memetic landscape of the right, they have turned their energy against russia and softened to the jews who now aid them and there is division in rightwing meme culture, I could give many examples but a bitchute account I'm subbed to formerly went by holocaust lies exposed, and now has renamed his channel to historical lies exposed, he is a ukrainian and no longer has holocaust or jew exposure based content but instead wags his finger at russia and the right who have "lionized" putin

This is becoming an essay so I'll lean into it; People will screech and Putin would probably have me put in prison if I said this in Russia but modern Russia, in terms of economy and government order more closely resembles national socialist Germany than Mussolini's Italy did, and Maoist china is dead and under Xi, and his hidden diet, modern communist china has perfected the vision of national socialism Mussolini had. Feel free to reject these opinions, but I see the core tenants of fascism as being somewhat nebulous and ideological and am looking at practical elements to make this comparison, china has a planned economy with a mixture of state production and free market(free so long as it lets a military polit agent on the board) and russia's economy is as free as a bird flying over the sea with nowhere to land, state dependence is baked in by sanctions and putin's coping measures for over a decade of sanctions has made a market deeply independent from globalism but somewhat dependent on government co-ordination compared to other world powers. IF you pressed me for a quote I would say Putins' russia has synthesized laissez-faire national socialism.

Why is the above relevant? the authentic natsocs in azov and putin should get along, that isn't crazy talk, a Ukraine independent from NATO globo-homo™ suits russia's defense needs, putin is guilty of all the same sins that lead judea and the rothschild cartel to declare war on germany, and azov should love that, putins russia is a defacto national socialist state and defacto fascist, putin's russia looks almost identical to azov's ideal ukraine, these two groups are blinded by past hatred and jewish confusion. Putin could recognize the holodomor and blame it on jews to avoid admitting russia owes anybody shit, the owing reparations part seems to be why putin denies it in the first place, and aside from russian parasite jews happy sucking his blood out of his dick, world jewery already hates putin.

I'll play devils advocate against my self, if azov developed into a legitimate political party and ruled ukraine putin may still face ideological subversion in russia by azov, though I'd think their main focus would be the west if they held power, alternatively for this to work putin would have to make probably too many concessions to a group of largely powerless nazis, at the time, and though he can rig his elections he has to do it on the margins like every other democracy, you can't just rig a 0 support candidate and so he does have to care about public opinion, and russia largely hates nazis, because russia probably couldn't exist without it's people believing the nazis were infinitely worse than the soviets. it seems anti russian sentiment is baked into azov, I don't understand it, but I do understand I wouldn't want to live in a country sharing a land border with western russia. If azov were making at least as much effort as golden dawn not to look like a carbon copy of the SA or SS I think putin might have been capable of selling azov as a valuable regional ally to the russian people, and I have to wonder if azov's image leaning into being neo nazis is by design of their jewish funders possibly for that exact reason.

I want to support azov's people, I don't want russia dissolved, or WW3, I blame western powers for the war in ukraine and mostly I want no more brother's wars.

TL:DR seems like the war has poisoned the well a bit huh?

Shower thoughts are normally pretty short but I just christened a new water heater with a shower, a soak, and a half a case of beer.

Consider the times we live in and historical parallels, such difficulties for a society or civilization usually precipitate change, the logical change would have been to pass the reigns to the group most confident in it's ability to correct course, the right, the real right, not rino cucks. I recognize "right" is a bit of misnomer considering we aren't in power and the status quo is not ours but you grasp my meaning anyway. The enemy is sabotaging civilization and we're the only people preaching it's defense and making suggestions for it's bolster or repair even in a blind society that would make us inevitable, and in short order our ideology would root in the public consciousness and then bloom; this is the cyclical nature of ideology. The enemy empowers us, a few of the people in their multimillion dollar think tanks must have seen such an obvious and inevitable outcome on the horizon, how then would they plan to preempt our ideological blooming, to stick to the metaphor, plant another nearly identical ideology too close, salt the ground surrounding both and see them fight over resources, that implies this was all planned for a long time, in reality I think they have miss-stepped and are scuttling some of their plans to avoid creating more problems, they want to simplify the game a little. Azov was meant to be a white bogey man to fuel their war on the white race and speed the west's collapse into a prison state. They would use planted assets in azov to create problems in america while funding azov in eastern Europe to create conflicts they could capitalize on by stealing children and enabling white slavery and hopefully direct this bogey man at russia while using the headlines at home to persecute whites. Instead jew funded azov will now fight the organic right for opinion space, it is like a schism in a young religion, the fractures will spread, and the whole squabble looks gross to anyone disinclined to learn the details and wards them off when before they might have been disillusioned enough with their old religion to convert, and now see an ugly slap fight that doesn't look suitable to guide them. There was a nigh unwavering memetic unity in rightwing spaces prior to the ukraine conflict, it's many facets and moving parts have created enough nuance to put many people at different ends of the table from one another where once they all sat on the same side, this fractious posture is solely an issue for the right, and this is what I'm saying may have been the point of provoking the conflict at this time, this conflict was always going to metastasize into something worse the only question was when, and it seems the west did everything to ensure the answer was now. The money pumped into azov and the right in ukraine invigorated their online presence and made them a staple fixture in the memetic landscape of the right, they have turned their energy against russia and softened to the jews who now aid them and there is division in rightwing meme culture, I could give many examples but a bitchute account I'm subbed to formerly went by holocaust lies exposed, and now has renamed his channel to historical lies exposed, he is a ukrainian and no longer has holocaust or jew exposure based content but instead wags his finger at russia and the right who have "lionized" putin This is becoming an essay so I'll lean into it; People will screech and Putin would probably have me put in prison if I said this in Russia but modern Russia, in terms of economy and government order more closely resembles national socialist Germany than Mussolini's Italy did, and Maoist china is dead and under Xi, and his hidden diet, modern communist china has perfected the vision of national socialism Mussolini had. Feel free to reject these opinions, but I see the core tenants of fascism as being somewhat nebulous and ideological and am looking at practical elements to make this comparison, china has a planned economy with a mixture of state production and free market(free so long as it lets a military polit agent on the board) and russia's economy is as free as a bird flying over the sea with nowhere to land, state dependence is baked in by sanctions and putin's coping measures for over a decade of sanctions has made a market deeply independent from globalism but somewhat dependent on government co-ordination compared to other world powers. IF you pressed me for a quote I would say Putins' russia has synthesized laissez-faire national socialism. Why is the above relevant? the authentic natsocs in azov and putin should get along, that isn't crazy talk, a Ukraine independent from NATO globo-homo™ suits russia's defense needs, putin is guilty of all the same sins that lead judea and the rothschild cartel to declare war on germany, and azov should love that, putins russia is a defacto national socialist state and defacto fascist, putin's russia looks almost identical to azov's ideal ukraine, these two groups are blinded by past hatred and jewish confusion. Putin could recognize the holodomor and blame it on jews to avoid admitting russia owes anybody shit, the owing reparations part seems to be why putin denies it in the first place, and aside from russian parasite jews happy sucking his blood out of his dick, world jewery already hates putin. I'll play devils advocate against my self, if azov developed into a legitimate political party and ruled ukraine putin may still face ideological subversion in russia by azov, though I'd think their main focus would be the west if they held power, alternatively for this to work putin would have to make probably too many concessions to a group of largely powerless nazis, at the time, and though he can rig his elections he has to do it on the margins like every other democracy, you can't just rig a 0 support candidate and so he does have to care about public opinion, and russia largely hates nazis, because russia probably couldn't exist without it's people believing the nazis were infinitely worse than the soviets. it seems anti russian sentiment is baked into azov, I don't understand it, but I do understand I wouldn't want to live in a country sharing a land border with western russia. If azov were making at least as much effort as golden dawn not to look like a carbon copy of the SA or SS I think putin might have been capable of selling azov as a valuable regional ally to the russian people, and I have to wonder if azov's image leaning into being neo nazis is by design of their jewish funders possibly for that exact reason. I want to support azov's people, I don't want russia dissolved, or WW3, I blame western powers for the war in ukraine and mostly I want no more brother's wars. TL:DR seems like the war has poisoned the well a bit huh? Shower thoughts are normally pretty short but I just christened a new water heater with a shower, a soak, and a half a case of beer.

(post is archived)