WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

723

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

but the definition of zionism means what i quoted lol, your opinion on what it means is irrelevant,

Read about the tenets of national socialism, it's in my initial pic.

they mean fuck all because this agreement took plae in 1933 ffs man get it though your head, 3rd time iv told you that now, the fact remains he sent 60,000 jews to what is now israel, he was a zoinist by the dictionary definition of the word

[–] 0 pt

What else was he supposed to do? Kill them all? He wasn't an evil man.

I have a hard time with this because there are like two histories going on at the same time.

To your knowledge, in short, what was the timeline and motive for the actions between ww1 and ww2? Because we both know the history books aren't right.

[–] 0 pt

and because he was not an "evil"(morals are relative) man he was a zionist, im not saying he was wrong, im simply saying he wanted the jews to have their own country and made a deal with them which would help accomplish both groups goals, he wanted them out of germany, they wanted their own country, everyone won but germany lost because hitler also stopped the global financiers from being able to cash in on german prosperity(Churchill is quoted to that effect too, its not a secret)

in short the german people where effectively becoming slaves to money with an increasing cost of living and decreasing quality of life, they had to resort to more and more depraved and demeaning acts, people started to notice just like they are doing today, eventually they revolted,

[–] 0 pt

This still doesn't make any sense because he was the catalyst for the German people being free of debt and thriving.

He removed the dollar being backed by the Jew bankers and created his own labour backed currency.

Are you implying he was the creator of both the problem and the solution?