WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

828

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

so, either the jews controlled it or they didnt, in which scenario is he not a zionist?

[–] 0 pt

Zionism to me implies a supremecy of Jews to others.

Hitler, to the best of my knowledge just wanted them the fuck out, that's it.

Read about the tenets of national socialism, it's in my initial pic.

He felt everyone had a right to preserve their culture, just don't fuck with others, in this case, the Germans.

He didn't hate black people, for example, just wanted them fucking their own race.

What about what I'm saying is confusing to you?

[–] 0 pt

but the definition of zionism means what i quoted lol, your opinion on what it means is irrelevant,

Read about the tenets of national socialism, it's in my initial pic.

they mean fuck all because this agreement took plae in 1933 ffs man get it though your head, 3rd time iv told you that now, the fact remains he sent 60,000 jews to what is now israel, he was a zoinist by the dictionary definition of the word

[–] 0 pt

What else was he supposed to do? Kill them all? He wasn't an evil man.

I have a hard time with this because there are like two histories going on at the same time.

To your knowledge, in short, what was the timeline and motive for the actions between ww1 and ww2? Because we both know the history books aren't right.