Either would be fine, would even take a baton or just fists.
The key for me would be avoiding undue losses (imprisonment, fines, courts, arrests) arising from escorting another gentleman to deaths door.
I have some ideas that could certainly revolutionize politics as well. For example, old way was if someone 'below' you challenged, it was no big deal to deny them satisfaction, they are lesser. Well I got a different view. For example, if a civilian challenged a holder of public office, they should be unable to decline (or lose their seat).
That 'motivator' seems more effective than "some groups of crazy people might kill you if you fuck about" ..... more like... That's Jim, the local tailor, he's got an appointment to kill you at 3 on thursday. His wife is setting up a picnic...should be nice.
Same..dont care along as both parties agree to 2 terms...what your dueling with and when is victory declared.
Intriguing. I agree with virtually everything you've said at least on an abstract level.
(post is archived)