WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

371

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Anyone can suggest anything. Its meaningless.

[–] 1 pt

Not when it's derived from breakthroughs and physical evidence from fossils.

[–] 0 pt

Youve seen the fossil records?

[–] 0 pt

I personally have not. The authors of the piece explained their deductive reasoning from the examination of fossils already carbon dated, finding branched whiskers instead of single strands (monofilaments), and from studying the development of feathers in baby birds.

BTW, who'd you piss off? All your comments are downvoted before I even look.