Not when it's derived from breakthroughs and physical evidence from fossils.
Not when it's derived from breakthroughs and physical evidence from fossils.
Youve seen the fossil records?
Youve seen the fossil records?
I personally have not. The authors of the piece explained their deductive reasoning from the examination of fossils already carbon dated, finding branched whiskers instead of single strands (monofilaments), and from studying the development of feathers in baby birds.
BTW, who'd you piss off? All your comments are downvoted before I even look.
I personally have not. The authors of the piece explained their deductive reasoning from the examination of fossils already carbon dated, finding branched whiskers instead of single strands (monofilaments), and from studying the development of feathers in baby birds.
BTW, who'd you piss off? All your comments are downvoted before I even look.
So youre just taking their word for it, then? Whats the accuracy of carbon dating and how can they possibly corroborate the accuracy back to such large time periods where nobody was around to monitor anything?
So youre just taking their word for it, then? Whats the accuracy of carbon dating and how can they possibly corroborate the accuracy back to such large time periods where nobody was around to monitor anything?
(post is archived)