Can't get further than one. Science isn't a process. Science encompasses many things. The process. The act of performing the process Checks on process is followed. Funding making the act of science possible. Source of funding. The people doing the acts. The translation of science into normie speak. Humanity itself. Biases. Prejudices. Preconceptions. Laziness. Greed etc. Peer pressure. Dara interpretation which is subjective. Science is nothing but a figment of your imagination. A concept. Without all of the above. Look at your response. You heard something that clearly emotionally upset you so you rejected everything. Two is also bullshit. Einstein theories were accepted and acted upon had existed for decades. Hell much of a century. Before they were measured. So in summary of your bs excuse. You don't know what conscious is but you reject it being more than just what can exist within brains because reasons you failed to list but believe in enough to get angry when questioned. Here is a fact about science you've ignored to support your bs rules. Science is is observation based. If we observe the effect of gravity or conscious then we must accept that it exists. We act upon knowledge of both even though our knowledge lacks full understanding. So this Ted talker asking questions is exactly the first steps that must be taken to progress knowledge. Your dogma entrenched kind is anti science no different to what galio encountered. "I don't know how to measure how or why the earth circles the sun I just observe that it does" Which BTW was the main reason why he was imprisoned. He could not explain his OBSERVATIONS. Guess what though? The earth did orbit the sun.