Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

The two most misunderstood technologies discussed on the internet are Teslas wydencliff tower and stanley meyers hydrogen production system from water. Here is what people get completely wrong.

Teslas tower was NOT made to broadcast energy up into the AIR. It was meant to broadcast energy DOWN into the EARTH . The mushroom shaped top was made to PREVENT leakage of energy into the air. If he wanted to broadcast into the AIR he would have used a pointed antenna.

Energy carries in the EARTH for huge distances if broadcast at the right frequencies and can be tapped with a simple grounding rod anywhere on the planet. It doesn't carry far in the AIR. Everyone doing Tesla coils showing large sparks in the air are using them in an unintended way only for show.

Stanley Myers hydrogen production system from water is NOT electrolysis. That uses amps to create hydrogen and wastes huge amounts of energy in water with electrolyte like salt added to it.

Meyer's system uses NO electrolyte and depends on the water remaining as a non conducting INSULATOR in the tuned circuit and uses bouncing voltage to build up a high voltage which pulses the water molecule to shatter it like a high frequency sound can shatter a crystal wine glass. This uses MUCH less energy than electrolysis. If you EVER see anyone adding salt or any other electrolyte to a supposed Stanley Myers watercell demonstration they are doing EXACTLY the wrong thing and no nothing about the circuit.

Furthermore the Myers circuit MUST have a diode so the resulting unipolar voltage adds up and builds up until the water molecules breakdown. If it doesn't have a diode the voltage in the step up circuit won't build up as the cycling positive and negative voltage simply cancel each other out.

And the Myers court case he lost had NOTHING to do with the validity of the circuit or hydrogen production. It was a claim by an investor that Myers promised some FINANCIAL things they said he didn't deliver. It didn't not judge the technology at all.

If anyone says Meyers circuit can't work because electrolysis...just stop right there. They don't know anything. If they ever add salt or anything to the water...again..stop right there. They know nothing.

Best and most revealing Stan meyer lecture

Start with this one at the 20 minute mark https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fhs-XYuTIQw&t=1522s

Part 2

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EyYBy9UF648

This is part 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P43zdSjKLyk

Part4 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LSZoEOfko8w

The two most misunderstood technologies discussed on the internet are Teslas wydencliff tower and stanley meyers hydrogen production system from water. Here is what people get completely wrong. Teslas tower was NOT made to broadcast energy up into the AIR. It was meant to broadcast energy DOWN into the EARTH . The mushroom shaped top was made to PREVENT leakage of energy into the air. If he wanted to broadcast into the AIR he would have used a pointed antenna. Energy carries in the EARTH for huge distances if broadcast at the right frequencies and can be tapped with a simple grounding rod anywhere on the planet. It doesn't carry far in the AIR. Everyone doing Tesla coils showing large sparks in the air are using them in an unintended way only for show. Stanley Myers hydrogen production system from water is NOT electrolysis. That uses amps to create hydrogen and wastes huge amounts of energy in water with electrolyte like salt added to it. Meyer's system uses NO electrolyte and depends on the water remaining as a non conducting INSULATOR in the tuned circuit and uses bouncing voltage to build up a high voltage which pulses the water molecule to shatter it like a high frequency sound can shatter a crystal wine glass. This uses MUCH less energy than electrolysis. If you EVER see anyone adding salt or any other electrolyte to a supposed Stanley Myers watercell demonstration they are doing EXACTLY the wrong thing and no nothing about the circuit. Furthermore the Myers circuit MUST have a diode so the resulting unipolar voltage adds up and builds up until the water molecules breakdown. If it doesn't have a diode the voltage in the step up circuit won't build up as the cycling positive and negative voltage simply cancel each other out. And the Myers court case he lost had NOTHING to do with the validity of the circuit or hydrogen production. It was a claim by an investor that Myers promised some FINANCIAL things they said he didn't deliver. It didn't not judge the technology at all. If anyone says Meyers circuit can't work because electrolysis...just stop right there. They don't know anything. If they ever add salt or anything to the water...again..stop right there. They know nothing. Best and most revealing Stan meyer lecture Start with this one at the 20 minute mark https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fhs-XYuTIQw&t=1522s Part 2 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EyYBy9UF648 This is part 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P43zdSjKLyk Part4 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LSZoEOfko8w

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (51).
[–] • 1 pt

Are you doing any experiments on Stanley Meyers work? I have been interested in this for years... great post!

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I studied them intensely for a while years ago.

Just makes me nuts when I see so many videos basically using tubes of steel but then adding salt to the water and having a simple dc or even ac current go through a transformer making gas and calling it a Meyer's system.

It will produce gas but using a lot of energy.

Meyer's system was a genius different system.

He basically built a tuned oscillating unipolar tank radio circuit and made the water be the dialectric in the capacitor. It was genius. A real breakthrough.

Its so sad to see idiots do it wrong and either say it doesn't work or it is a Meyer's system.

[–] • 1 pt

Agreed. I believe he was able to harness resonant frequencies on a molecular and controlled basis. I should start some experiments up again...

[–] • 1 pt

I did some years ago. It works. In fact its amazing how much hydrogen you can make just by hooking two stainless pipes inside each other separated by zip ties shoved between them (the perfect distance) and hooking one to each of two battery charger leads a d putting some salt in the water. That's not Meyer's system but it sure is easy to do and if you don't care about how much energy you use you can make tons of burnable and explosive gas (be very careful) without even building the circuit.

[–] • 0 pt

You will like this Start with this one at the 20 minute mark https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fhs-XYuTIQw&t=1522s

[–] • 0 pt

That was a great clip I don't think I've seen before... thanks!

[–] • 0 pt

Its by far the best explanation by him fo what he is doing and shows him to be a master of the subject. Go to that channel and watch parts 2 3 and 4 of that lecture.