Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

792

The two most misunderstood technologies discussed on the internet are Teslas wydencliff tower and stanley meyers hydrogen production system from water. Here is what people get completely wrong.

Teslas tower was NOT made to broadcast energy up into the AIR. It was meant to broadcast energy DOWN into the EARTH . The mushroom shaped top was made to PREVENT leakage of energy into the air. If he wanted to broadcast into the AIR he would have used a pointed antenna.

Energy carries in the EARTH for huge distances if broadcast at the right frequencies and can be tapped with a simple grounding rod anywhere on the planet. It doesn't carry far in the AIR. Everyone doing Tesla coils showing large sparks in the air are using them in an unintended way only for show.

Stanley Myers hydrogen production system from water is NOT electrolysis. That uses amps to create hydrogen and wastes huge amounts of energy in water with electrolyte like salt added to it.

Meyer's system uses NO electrolyte and depends on the water remaining as a non conducting INSULATOR in the tuned circuit and uses bouncing voltage to build up a high voltage which pulses the water molecule to shatter it like a high frequency sound can shatter a crystal wine glass. This uses MUCH less energy than electrolysis. If you EVER see anyone adding salt or any other electrolyte to a supposed Stanley Myers watercell demonstration they are doing EXACTLY the wrong thing and no nothing about the circuit.

Furthermore the Myers circuit MUST have a diode so the resulting unipolar voltage adds up and builds up until the water molecules breakdown. If it doesn't have a diode the voltage in the step up circuit won't build up as the cycling positive and negative voltage simply cancel each other out.

And the Myers court case he lost had NOTHING to do with the validity of the circuit or hydrogen production. It was a claim by an investor that Myers promised some FINANCIAL things they said he didn't deliver. It didn't not judge the technology at all.

If anyone says Meyers circuit can't work because electrolysis...just stop right there. They don't know anything. If they ever add salt or anything to the water...again..stop right there. They know nothing.

Best and most revealing Stan meyer lecture

Start with this one at the 20 minute mark https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fhs-XYuTIQw&t=1522s

Part 2

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EyYBy9UF648

This is part 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P43zdSjKLyk

Part4 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LSZoEOfko8w

The two most misunderstood technologies discussed on the internet are Teslas wydencliff tower and stanley meyers hydrogen production system from water. Here is what people get completely wrong. Teslas tower was NOT made to broadcast energy up into the AIR. It was meant to broadcast energy DOWN into the EARTH . The mushroom shaped top was made to PREVENT leakage of energy into the air. If he wanted to broadcast into the AIR he would have used a pointed antenna. Energy carries in the EARTH for huge distances if broadcast at the right frequencies and can be tapped with a simple grounding rod anywhere on the planet. It doesn't carry far in the AIR. Everyone doing Tesla coils showing large sparks in the air are using them in an unintended way only for show. Stanley Myers hydrogen production system from water is NOT electrolysis. That uses amps to create hydrogen and wastes huge amounts of energy in water with electrolyte like salt added to it. Meyer's system uses NO electrolyte and depends on the water remaining as a non conducting INSULATOR in the tuned circuit and uses bouncing voltage to build up a high voltage which pulses the water molecule to shatter it like a high frequency sound can shatter a crystal wine glass. This uses MUCH less energy than electrolysis. If you EVER see anyone adding salt or any other electrolyte to a supposed Stanley Myers watercell demonstration they are doing EXACTLY the wrong thing and no nothing about the circuit. Furthermore the Myers circuit MUST have a diode so the resulting unipolar voltage adds up and builds up until the water molecules breakdown. If it doesn't have a diode the voltage in the step up circuit won't build up as the cycling positive and negative voltage simply cancel each other out. And the Myers court case he lost had NOTHING to do with the validity of the circuit or hydrogen production. It was a claim by an investor that Myers promised some FINANCIAL things they said he didn't deliver. It didn't not judge the technology at all. If anyone says Meyers circuit can't work because electrolysis...just stop right there. They don't know anything. If they ever add salt or anything to the water...again..stop right there. They know nothing. Best and most revealing Stan meyer lecture Start with this one at the 20 minute mark https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fhs-XYuTIQw&t=1522s Part 2 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EyYBy9UF648 This is part 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P43zdSjKLyk Part4 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LSZoEOfko8w

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (51).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

From (((wikipedia)))

Tesla developed his own ideas on how a worldwide wireless system would work. He theorized from these experiments that if he injected electric current into the Earth at just the right frequency he could harness what he believed was the planet's own electrical charge and cause it to resonate at a frequency that would be amplified in "standing waves" that could be tapped anywhere on the planet to run devices or, through modulation, carry a signal. His system was based more on 19th century ideas of electrical conduction and telegraphy instead of the newer theories of air-borne electromagnetic waves, with an electrical charge being conducted through the ground and being returned through the air.

It wouldn't work all that well and there were people who had made "radio" equipment using ground waves but they were very limited in the distance they could transmit and receive.

Tesla's design used a concept of a charged conductive upper layer in the atmosphere,[6] a theory dating back to an 1872 idea for a proposed wireless power system by Mahlon Loomis. Tesla not only believed that he could use this layer as his return path in his electrical conduction system, but that the power flowing through it would make it glow, providing night time lighting for cities and shipping lanes.

He believed he had achieved Earth resonance which, according to his theory, would work at any distance.

Yeah, real new agey crackpot S H I T.

Do you know what would happen if someone put some systems like this online right now? ALL radio frequency devices would be inoperable. Think about that for a moment and remember that this was done before the vacuum tube was in regular use. Edison discovered those when developing the light bulb but did not take advantage of his discovery.