WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

868

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Literally everything you just wrote is totally wrong. The least of which you misunderstood what your link is saying in order to justify your deep seated need to confirm that your religious views are correct.

That link wrote that 50% of all published papers cannot be replicated. What it did not say is that peer riview is complete garbage. What it actually said is this:

All humans lie all the time everywhere, and, it turns out that we just assumed that peer reviewed science was immune to this nature of the human species which was wrong.

Congratulations.

// EDIT: Re-read this, and it comes across too harsh. My apologies, that is my old athiest training.

[–] 0 pt

In no logical context of my comment do I equate creationism with the article I linked. I made two distinct points, separated by a paragraph break. Your comment wasn't what I would call harsh, it was an illogical attempt to build up and tear down a straw man version of an argument I never made.

Your response reads as a knee jerk reaction to a world view which challenges your own religiously held belief against the existence of a Creator. It was a desperately flailing attempt to deny the obvious reality that things which you can touch and see existing are made manifest by the intelligent design of man. I believe it is no great leap to assume that, as intelligent design is an operable principle in practice (i.e. the intelligent design of a computer), it is likely that a 'being' beyond our comprehension created 'life' as we perceive it.

[–] 0 pt

Fair enough.

Prove your creator exists.

[–] 0 pt

I exist

[–] 0 pt

All humans lie all the time everywhere, and, it turns out that we just assumed that peer reviewed science was immune to this nature of the human species which was wrong.

Boy isn’t that the truth. I really used to think scientists were just better people who had a monk like devotion to uncovering the objective truth! Now that idea seems incredibly naive to me. Scientists like nice things! They also love to please their peers and superiors! Its like they’re regular people or something!