I think we all have a natural ability to sense bullshit built into our dna. As we gain experience in life, hopefully, we keep on working on making the bullshit testing skill better.
I'm 100% in support of the scientific method and even spirited devotion to an idea or ideology even if it is wrong. Sometimes to find out the limits of an idea you need a kind of zombie devotion to the idea.
But, when watching someone like this scientists push an idea where you neither have expertice nor ever even a hope of understanding or testing anything that they say, we end up in a situation where you have to lean on this natural bullshit sensor to smell out when something might be wrong.
Here is what my bullshit sensor is telling me:
1) TOO MOTIVATED TO BE RIGHT - He seems to be highly motivated in the idea that vaccines work, regardless of vaccine technology and measurements of success.
2) HE TALKS ABOUT MEASUREMENT IN VERY BLACK AND WHITE WAYS - We all know everything in the universe is measure on a spectrum of probability, nothing is black and white. He is way way way too energetic about how sure he is over the efficacy of vaccines and mrna vaccines in particular given that this is the first time they have been deployed.
I trust engineers to be precise in measurement because that is repeatable, but, in complex systems measurement is far far more fuzzy.
3) HE IS LEAVING A LOT OF INFORMATION - Obviously, when communicating verbally it isn't possible to communicated everything. Also, this is a clip, so who knows if he is truly honest.
But, from what I am seeing here is that he is deliberately leaving out a whole set of concerns and potential issues because he has either classified them as "woo" (I do this as well) or doesn't want to bring them into the conversation to give them credence.
Now, it is true that if you put all ideas on the table at once, you cannot have a conversation because the human mind cannot comprehend everythign simultaneously.
But, I don't trust anyone that leaves stuff out of the conversation by default. Someone introduced me to the ratchet effect in another thread and this would be an example of the ratchet effect: if someone like this can convince enough people that he is right by leaving information out, his idea wins and gets to go on to the next round and perhaps win again. Ratcheting up the whole system in favour of his bias versus someone elses.
4) DELIBERATE MISLABELING - mrna vaccines are not vaccines. THEY ARE GENTIC THERAPY. While it is true that semantically you can fuzzy logic your way into re-labeling everything, we do it all the time, the inverse is true as well: if you delibrately use semantics TO NOT FIX mislabeling you are deliberately participating in a misinformation campaign.
I don't trust these mother fuckers. I support vaccines, I am extremely concerned about mrna vaccines because no one knows the long terms effects of this. We are only now starting to find out out the effects of plastics based chemicals on human reproductive systems, who knows what happens when you start fucking aroudn with editing of any part of the human genome structures.
I got to 2:36 and that was it, so many fucking lies. He can't keep his story straight for ten seconds.
They're all like that.
covid19 doesn't exist.
culture the virus hundreds of times and hope for weakened mutations of the virus but keep the virus able to elicit an immune response and then (((we))) give you that strain as a shot
Issue; That isn't what the mRNA genetic bio-weapon is. The mRNA genetic bio-weapon contains no part of any coronavirus. None. Let alone the completely made-up, fake, non-existent Covid19 virus.
or take another species of virus - the cold virus for example
What in the fuck
This (((expert))) can't even lie properly. The cold is literally the same species of virus that covid19 is claimed as.
Seriously. I have been in school taking all these science classes and it is a huge red flag when everything that I have learned about the immune system, vaccines, viruses, disease, and protocols and trials that drugs undergo before being green lit have all been thrown out the window.
Rather than question the science or request empirical data from sources not paid by establishment forces, the sheep went from "trust the system" to "trust the science". Science is not to be trusted, it is to be audited and peer reviewed, if it can remain standing against strict scrutiny then it is more reliable than other conclusions that have to depend on censorship to survive.
The fucking BASIS of all modern science is the scientific method which is essentially: "no nigger, do not trust the science".
THAT FUCKER TRIED TO PRETEND the 99.973% all ages SARS-2 survival rate is less than 99.0 % !!!! What a fucking liar!!
What a liar.
Is he a Jew?
Yes, you could tell at the beginning. He started talking about erzats something. Erzats is German and means replacement or substitution, but it is also used in Yiddish with the same meaning.
I want to see hard numbers to know efficacy of it versus a control group beyond any shadow of a doubt, the hard numbers on who are getting side effects, what the specific side effects are, and I want to see the 5 year long term data on all of the above.
Until I have that data, I'm not going to be engaging in a clinical trial as a non-control subject - because that's what this vaccination drive is - the last stage of a clinical trial, where the unvaccinated are the control group.
It is amazing how every single protocol designed for medicine development has been thrown out the window and now we are branded as anti science for requesting the most rudimentary of empirical evidence.
Most people I've spoken to, to date, when you tell them that you're not going to get this shit, are actually understanding - or have their own misgivings. Not everyone is a "You're an anti-vaxxer, reeeee!" which is great. A lot of it is pushed by media and loud mouthy fuckwits.
I'll take my chances with 99% chance of surviving. I'm fine with that.
All of my cousins had it and my 80 year old aunt had it. No problems. One person in their late 20s was down and out for like two weeks, she had a bit of a harder time but it was just nausea, temperature and symptoms like that. My 80 year old aunt says she had a difficult time but just took some vitamin c and some other over the counter medicines and powered through it.
Nice! Yeah, I did the vitamin C last year mega-dosing everyday. I took at least a gram and a half each day, up to 4 grams, and learned the value of moderation. After about a week I had unexpected explosive diarrhea constantly so I had to stop.
I had it. All that happened was I lost my sense of smell for 5 days. I felt 100% normal. If I hadn’t lost my sense of smell I wouldn’t have known I had it.
My nose used to get stuffed up during a flu. Loss of smell. My throat would be sore and with lots of phlem. Basically loss of taste included.
That’s what was weird about it. I didn’t have any symptoms except my smell disappearing. My nose wasn’t blocked up. I didn’t cough. I could taste. I just couldn’t smell anything
1/10=.1 purposed vaccine deaths in his own example 1/90= .0011 purposed non vaccinated deaths in his own example when i went to school .1 > .011 his example codifies that the human immune system reduces overall death better than the vaccinated, but you may have to suffer through a fever and a coof. take some tylenol and some robitussinn you fucking incel!! The ignorance is mind boggling, Rogan let missed it or he let him off the hook... although Rogan has gone corporate as of late so my guess is the latter.
Everyone is a pussy and runs to the doctor with every little sneeze. It starts with the "well" visits they demand for the kids. What bullshit.
The body can recognize the spike protein as foreign, but not the virus, which the body accepts as normal. Hmm doesn't make sense does it? It's the same protein that let's the virus bind to your cells. It binds to a specific receptor (ACE2) It's also an enzyme that breaks down angiotensin 2.
There are 9 types of angiotensin. By blocking the ace 2 receptor with a spike protein or virus, you disrupt the whole angiotensin chain. Not to mention your body can't break down angiotensin because the spike protein is already on the ace 2 receptor being broken down by it(ace 2 receptor), since it is an enzyme and hormone receptor.
The vaccine and virus cause a hormonal imbalance which precludes covid. That is the so called cytokine storm.
The angiotensin system, that explains why people are getting strokes.
vaccine is now killing more than the flu did.
I watched it fully before I read your post and didn't see any problem. He seemed enthusiastic but was just laying out the information about these things. I think he did a good job summarizing things.
He described how vaccines work, and the various approaches to "tip off" the immune system without giving it a huge viral load. He was a little disingenuous about the 99% survival rate mainly being shaped by old and sick people, whereas young people have a much higher rate (something like 99.95%). He should have clarified this because it would have made the case for old/sick people getting the vaccine, but not young people.
He properly clarified how the vaccine's effect wasn't instead of the body's defenses, but improved it. He also explained how it might not even lower death rate, as that's another issue compared to symptom rate.
The only question I had was whether these mRNA vaccines keep making your body produce these spike proteins, or just for a little while. If it keeps making this happen, that's freaky as hell. Even with what he described I still wouldn't touch a vaccine. Even if the narrative is true and there's no sinister plan, there are still too many unknowns, lack of quality control, rushed production, lots of untested things, etc. I don't trust even the most virtuous humans to produce something like this safely.
4) DELIBERATE MISLABELING - mrna vaccines are not vaccines. THEY ARE GENTIC THERAPY.
Are you saying his description is wrong? From what he said, viruses themselves inject RNA into the cell to produce its parts. This mRNA vaccine does the same to produce parts the same as SARS-CoV-2 does. Assuming this is correct, then it's no different than what viruses do, throw RNA into your cells and let their genetic machinery produce proteins based on it, then spit them out. Where is it modifying your genes?
He said for the old its 80% survival which is total bullshit.
The median age of death from all sources of men is 79 and women 80. If it wasn't the boomer plague it would be something else.
Video was from last year. Was there ever a group that had a 20% fatality rate, even one with co-morbidities?
I barely got into the video and had to turn it off due to him clearly not knowing what the fuck he was even saying and backpedaling on almost every sentence he was saying. Clearly he is lying and sees how bad what he is saying is coming off and trying hard to make it come out the way he wants......
4) DELIBERATE MISLABELING - mrna vaccines are not vaccines. THEY ARE GENTIC THERAPY.
PERIOD. It is NOT a vaccine at all, it is genetic therapy being sold as a vaccine and previous testing of this type of genetic therapy ended badly for ALL the test animals in every study. 100% death rate. ONE HUNDRED PERCENT. I do hope this asshole gets the shots but I bet you he gets fake ones at best because clearly he knows better....
(post is archived)