None of our distance measurements would change because our standard candles wouldn't change. Parallax is not dependent on the speed of light being a constant, it's based on perspective, which is based on the Inverse Square Law. We measure longer distances by using either cepheid variables or type 1 supernovae. Those are what are called "standard candles."
Look, I'd love to spend several years of my time putting you through 40 hours per week of instruction so that you could know all the stuff you currently don't know that makes you think "I don't know how this works therefore it doesn't work" like some arrogant sociopath asshole might. BGut you can;t afford to hire me to do that. So go crack a fucking book, 'tardo.
You claim to be versed on this topic, but you've failed to clearly defend your position.
If it would take you years of 40-hour weeks to explain it to me, you clearly don't know it that well.
Edit: blocked me after his last comment (he got upset, you must forgive him)
Here is what I tried to reply with. Enjoy
and think that means there must be nothing worth knowing
This is not true. on the contrary. I believe there is much more that we don't know, than that we do.
To give up on the attempt to make sense of the chaos, finding the harmony in this life, would be a mistake.I am very pleased with this conversation. As it has continued, you've only served to prove you are not capable of debate without devolving into petty name calling.
And you know nothing at all, and think that means there must be nothing worth knowing. You're not as clever as you think you are, fag. In fact, you're just like every other gaywad hipster piece of shit who thinks he's the first dipshit who ever thought he was a genius for zagging when everyone else was zigging. What position have you defended again? That homosexuality is a valid lifestyle? I disagree, fag.
(post is archived)