WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

183

2018 report shows that Johnson & Johnson knew (since 1957) that its baby powder contained asbestos but hid it from the public. Lawsuits allege J&J products caused ovarian cancer. CBS News senior national correspondent Jim Axelrod reports.

1970s baby powder commercial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbYfoCbVt0M

2018 report shows that Johnson & Johnson knew (since 1957) that its baby powder contained asbestos but hid it from the public. Lawsuits allege J&J products caused ovarian cancer. CBS News senior national correspondent Jim Axelrod reports. 1970s baby powder commercial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbYfoCbVt0M

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

What the fuck. Was she breathing the shit it in? Why is she the only one with cancer? I'm pressing X for doubtful.

[–] 5 pts

"Of all product defect cases in 2016, 6 of the 7 largest verdicts went against Johnson & Johnson (classaction.com)

Timeline, talc found in tumors. (oppenheimlaw.com)

it's not like they don't advertise putting it near your private parts. (youtube.com)

diaper rash protection, 2015 (youtube.com)

Think what you want, but this company is evil as fuck. (penntoday.upenn.edu) I have more coming, found digging into this, could not fit all their wicked deeds into just one post.

[–] 2 pts

Eh effin solid research my bud. J&J is super dubious.

Might as well be Johnstien & Johnburg.

[–] 3 pts

if its health beauty or cosmetic related its gonna have a jew behind it.

there is almost nothing that any of those industries produce that we actually need if we are living normal natural healthy lives.

[–] 3 pts

thank u goat.

Counter-currents.com: (counter-currents.com)

"The Establishment pretends that non-Jewish whites constitute a cohesive elite that controls the United States. ...

An examination of the Johnson family reveals that whites in the Jewish Establishment are white in name only. They symbolize the downfall and subjugation of the race to which their ancestors belonged.

The public “influence” of Casey’s father (web.archive.org), or her cousin Jamie Johnson, for example, exists only as long as it promotes the goals of the dominant anti-white elite. Woody Johnson’s two most notable public roles have been membership in the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) and serving as the fourth largest contributor to the presidential campaigns of Zionist George W. Bush. This is not “leadership,” but irresponsible followership (jacksonville.com). Contrast the Johnsons’ aimless hedonism, conformism, and unseemly desperation to be socially accepted with the coldly calculated, tightly coordinated behavior of their Jewish counterparts who ruthlessly shoved the U.S. into the Middle East to serve Zionist interests. Jews are a purposive, cohesive ethnic elite; aimless, directionless whites are raceless. Indeed, if they were not, they would be unceremoniously and pitilessly destroyed—as everyone knows."

[–] 3 pts (edited )

She put it in her vajayjay, and she's not the only cancer victim. I have mixed feelings about this. The asbestos in the talc is naturally occurring, and the product was/is safe to use as intended (for baby's asses). Apparently J&J (a giant corporation who I'd probably hate if I looked into it more) was supposed to know that women were using the product off label, know that such usage was harmful, and somehow stop them from using it.

This just feels like American sue-happiness run amok yet again. One thing I am sure of is that there are tons of law firms specializing in asbestos litigation whose pool of both victims and defendants is drying up.

So yeah I don't love the corp arbitrarily, and I guess you have to feel for sorry for people who got cancer, but this sounds like more of an unfortunate situation than some crime that that needs redressing.

[–] 2 pts

That was like the panic over nestle supposedly sucking springs dry in florida.

After finding out the daily volume of the spring, it turns out nestles "millions of gallons" they were requesting?

Yeah it amounted to only 2.5% of the spring output--when the spring is at 50% flow.

They wanted a tiny fraction of the river output for bottling.

But nestle is evil, just look at california. So why defend them?

Same thing with J&J.

Actually nestle is arguably worse, because they're pushing the privatization of public water, while goldman sachs pushes water exchanges/water markets, creating a market for commodity speculation on water--just what we need: more fucking crooks, messing with the price of one more thing in everyday life, at the expense of everyone else. They call it the "blue gold phenomenon". What a bunch of bullshit.

[–] 2 pts

The girls were using it to keep thier cooches dry