I don't quite understand what is going on, but it doesn't sound like a "time machine" - it sounds like a process to reform particles into a previous known configuration.
Seems like every pool player "goes back in time" when they re-rack the balls, no?
Having to 'move forward in time' to 'go back in time' makes no sense.
I don't quite understand what is going on, but it doesn't sound like a "time machine" - it sounds like a process to reform particles into a previous known configuration.
Seems like every pool player "goes back in time" when they re-rack the balls, no?
Having to 'move forward in time' to 'go back in time' makes no sense.
There are two questions here: 1), did the machine require the expected amount of energy to reverse it's calculates. And 2), why is the same paragraph copied in the article twice????
There are two questions here: 1), did the machine require the expected amount of energy to reverse it's calculates. And 2), why is the same paragraph copied in the article twice????
You just don't understand the science , you bigot ....
You just don't understand the science , you bigot ....
(post is archived)