WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

They never got around the Van Allen belts. It was too difficult to do it by 1969 but the public had been hyped up so much and our cold war rep was on the line so NASA had to fake it to make it.

They never got around the Van Allen belts. It was too difficult to do it by 1969 but the public had been hyped up so much and our cold war rep was on the line so NASA had to fake it to make it.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

You're a smart guy. Spend some time reading what some legit experts have to say on the moon landing.

aulis.com

Men didn't go to the moon.

[–] 2 pts

You're a smart guy. Spend some time reading what some legit experts have to say on the moon landing.

I've been through these debates countless times. Going to another site that catalogs the same arguments I've already been through isn't gong to change my mind.

How very open minded of you. You've no idea what the "debates" are at that site.

There's a hell of a lot more in depth scientific analysis there than you'll find on your average Internet conspiracy site. I'd go as far as to say it's irrefutable proof that we never went.

[–] 1 pt

How very open minded of you. You've no idea what the "debates" are at that site.

Actually, I do. Because before I replied to you, I took a peek. I clicked from the main page: "Debunking the Apollo Myth", and it starts talking about the stars. I've been through this debate before. It's not interesting or new, and in fact is one of the weaker arguments.

[–] 0 pt

I love how this topic triggers some people.

Someone wasted a down vote on me. I guess when you're already tagged suspicious, what difference does it make?

I'll admit I still occasionally down vote idiots out of habit but so far not to the extent I've gotten tagged.

[–] -1 pt

These faggots think that points mean something here LOL.

[–] -1 pt

You're . . . surprised?! So, you're completely unaware that opposing the official story on this is verboten?