Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

They never got around the Van Allen belts. It was too difficult to do it by 1969 but the public had been hyped up so much and our cold war rep was on the line so NASA had to fake it to make it.

They never got around the Van Allen belts. It was too difficult to do it by 1969 but the public had been hyped up so much and our cold war rep was on the line so NASA had to fake it to make it.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (152).
[–] • 1 pt

Space is fake and gay. The earth is a motionless plane. Its jew magik tricks.

https://files.catbox.moe/u7caga.PNG

Apollo 11- Post moon landing Conference

* https://youtu.be/xyjppxh2-C0

Consider the resolution of the human eye and its ability to distinguish two points at a distance. This is observed by the converging lines of perception forming a "false horizon" and easily proved by laying on your stomach in a field and watching someone walk away from you (you could use a camera too). Your angle of view determines the convergent point for the false horizon. This phenomena would be observed on both a sphere model and on an infinite plane model.

When a ship disappears bottom first, it is because of the ocean waves between the observer and the bottom of the ship are two points that no longer become distinguishable from eachother and hence they "converge" into a false horizon. This is proved by watching a ship disappear with your own naked eyes, only to be brought back into view with modern viewing equipment.

How could modern viewing equipment do this? Resolution of the equipment verses the resolution and biological limitations of the human eye. The equipment as a higher resolution and as a result it can distinguish two points with greater clarity. All of this is observed at a range well under the needed distance to get the SAME effect out of the actual curvature of the earth.

Meaning; most people attribute the "bottom up" effect to the actual curvature of the earth where in fact it is actually due to their perception alone. The height required to actually observe the curvature of the earth is over 40k ft. All arguments saying the curvature of the earth is proven by x object disappearing are false conclusions.

__

Video backups;

  • Globalists and their lies prove the earth is flat

https://www.bitchute.com/video/bWRgmgyjobmf/

  • Simple Proof that the ISS is Nothing More than a Hollywood Production

https://files.catbox.moe/3km5oq.mp4

  • The ISS Exposed

https://files.catbox.moe/5mp5mv.mp4

  • A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon

https://www.bitchute.com/video/7m8rlf5PfUjo/

  • 7 Rockets Hit Dome!

https://files.catbox.moe/a09e9u.mp4

  • Flat Earth Awakening ~ Fake Space Documentary 2019

https://files.catbox.moe/s6s322.mp4

  • Are We Spinning?

  • Astronauts Gone Wild

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3TosA56Sgyp6/

Tom buy my tshirts delonge coms

Tis unconceivable that inanimate brute matter should (without the mediation of something else which is not material) operate upon & affect other matter without mutual contact; as it must if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential & inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe {innate} gravity to me. That gravity should be innate inherent & {essential} to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by & through which their action or force {may} be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I beleive no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent {acting} <7v> consta{ntl}y according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial is a question I have left to the consideration of my readers.

Thats from newton himself.

http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00258

https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG

https://files.catbox.moe/c0tqe8.PNG

https://nypost.com/2014/04/03/bill-clinton-an-alien-attack-would-unite-us-i-investigated-area-51/

https://youtu.be/CDScioLF-PQ

[–] • 3 pts

And here comes the kike trying to disprove perfectly reasonable conspiracy theories by associating them with unreasonable ones.

[–] • 0 pt

Here comes the kike trying to prevent people from realizing that you filthy parasites have enslaved them to a degree beyond their ability to understand.

No other subject was brought up, you tied it to other truths because;

  • you are a retarded nigger that lacks the IQ required to understand you've been duped.

  • you are a triggered lil' bitch that suffers from extreme cognitive dissonance so you lash out.

  • you are an actual kike serving to gatekeep your main binders on the goyim.

Truth fears no investigation. Kill yourself moshie.

[–] • 2 pts

I've investigated flat earth. It does not hold up. The moon landings being faked is much more reasonable. So is the theory that kike bankers like Epstein, Maxwell, Bronfman, and Ben Mosh run their pedo blackmail rings to control world leaders so they can take control of world finance and rob all of us of a massive amount of money. Stop distracting from legitimate things with crazy bullshit about the earth being flat.