Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

They never got around the Van Allen belts. It was too difficult to do it by 1969 but the public had been hyped up so much and our cold war rep was on the line so NASA had to fake it to make it.

They never got around the Van Allen belts. It was too difficult to do it by 1969 but the public had been hyped up so much and our cold war rep was on the line so NASA had to fake it to make it.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (152).
[–] • 0 pt

You talk all that shit and can't do something as simple as link to something you believe he can't refute, and this is your reply? You've now lost all credibility. Carry on

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

There is no magic bullet which is why I linked him to that site. Evidence is compiled piece by piece. It's the preponderance of the evidence that matters. People like the dork I was conversing with will ALWAYS find some way to explain away evidence of fraud no matter how compelling. It's the way "skeptics" argue.

A true skeptic is open to truth and weighs each piece of evidence carefully in pursuit thereof. A clown like this guy (and you) are ready to dismiss ANYTHING and EVERYTHING put in front of them by twisting themselves into pretzels, thereby missing the forest for the trees.

My mind is made up - don't confuse me with the facts.

As I wasn't discussing this with you to begin with, your assessment of my credibility is meaningless. As you were.

[–] • 0 pt

All you had to do was link one article you find irrefutable, and you can't do it, so you type endless excuses. You lost. Game over. Now go peck out paragraphs of bullshit while we all laugh at your silly ass.

As I wasn't discussing this with you to begin with, your assessment of my credibility is meaningless. As you were.

It's an open forum lil buddy, anyone can chime in. Love how you lash out when you're easily made to look like the fool you are. YOU'RE the one who is convinced that he's wrong, and YOU'RE the one that pointed to that site, yet you're not able to link to a single article that he can't refute. Again, you look a fool and you lost this one. Take the L and go at your tendies lil buddy.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Again tl;dr. I got to the part where you said I lashed out, lol. No, what I did was logically explain that it's the overwhelming mountain of evidence that matters.

There will always be Dunning Krugers such as yourself for which the clear and convincing evidence will be above their ability to understand. Why point to anything for you? You're not interested in truth - just in denying no matter what.

Have a nice day shill.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Hey faggot, got one for you. No technical analysis needed. Just explain to me why the astrnots were manipulating the view and lying in the following video.

Watch from 36:41 and provide your best bullshit explanation. Why would they need to fuck around with the shot like this? NASA literally caught with their pants down.

Explain please. Give me your best pilpul. I need a good laugh.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PKRYt6Dq0Jqj/

I'm waiting.