WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

They never got around the Van Allen belts. It was too difficult to do it by 1969 but the public had been hyped up so much and our cold war rep was on the line so NASA had to fake it to make it.

They never got around the Van Allen belts. It was too difficult to do it by 1969 but the public had been hyped up so much and our cold war rep was on the line so NASA had to fake it to make it.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

No, because different populations don't evolve the same way. Once you separate two populations they're going to go in their own direction.

Are you and your brother the same?

Are you and your cousin the same?

Are you more similar to your brother than to distant cousins?

Are you more similar to distant cousins than to the average member of your ethnic group?

Are you more similar to the average member of your ethnic than to different closely related ethnic groups (Brits, Germanics, Nords, Iberians, Italics, Slavs, Greeks, etc.)?

Are you more similar to closely related but different ethnic groups than to different races (Brits and Germans vs whites and blacks)?

You're more similar to those who are closely related to you than those who are distantly related. Over enough generations the distance can grow by a lot. Over hundreds of generations you get the differences between close ethnic groups. Over thousands you get the difference between races. Over tens of thousands you get similar species. Over millions of generations you get very distantly related species.

[–] -1 pt (edited )

You have any evidence for that, or are you just repeating, in childlike terms, what you were taught in biology?

I am not descended from a nigger, or a monkey.

What you are describing is simple reproductive biology, and has nothing to do with the "theory of evolution".

edit - SHouldn't the Boer all look like sand niggers by now? They've been in africa for 500 years.

Nope, still White as the driven snow, eh?