Except its one debate of literally dozens if not hundreds of others that can be found there.
You are cherry picking to enforce your confirmation bias.
Go look at some of the other highly technical analyses that you'll need to refute to maintain your world view. My guess is you won't because damn the facts, your mind is made up.
Except its one debate of literally dozens if not hundreds of others that can be found there.
Yeah, that's fine, but what makes you think I haven't heard of those either?
You are cherry picking to enforce your confirmation bias.
No, I literally picked the most obvious argument I could find. To say I cherry picked means I would have sifted through the site to find the weakest.
Go look at some of the other highly technical analyses that you'll need to refute to maintain your world view. My guess is you won't because damn the facts, your mind is made up.
Go fuck off. I won't because I"ve already spent inordinate amounts of time looking into these topics, and given far more critical thought about them than casual people such as yourself who go no further than, "I'm convinced!", and then handwave at some site or reference.
No, I literally picked the most obvious argument I could find.
You're literally admitting you picked the most obvious argument you could defend against in your own mind. The most obvious argument according to YOU, lol. That hardly means you've won the debate.
You cherry picked and then attempted to deny it in the most obvious fashion because you're dumber than my dog.
Bottom line, the most obvious arguments are shallow and can be debated endlessly by Internet retards. The real evidence is found in the technical analysis by experts in their respective fields.
You scratched the surface and concluded with go fuck yourself. You can't handle someone challenging your worldview - your hostility is a dead give away.
Have a nice night insecure soyboy or paid shill. Haha, you lost.
You're literally admitting you picked the most obvious argument you could defend against in your own mind.
No, you dumbass. You handwaved at a giant site with tons of links. Do you think I'm going to read the whole site? I tried to find the most relevant link, that is, what appeared to be the most obvious link to go to if somebody wandered in and wanted to be hit with the best shot that the moon landings were faked.
As I said, I've already been through these arguments countless times, so it's no surprise when I did that it was one I've seen before, and that it was weak and uninteresting -- not my fault, is it? This is the site YOU chose to change my mind. You didn't link to a particular article with your best shot. YOU chose to handwave.
(post is archived)