Then pick an article or topic from the site that he can't refute and link to it. How hard it that?
What's your motive? Why do you care? I smell another shill.
You talk all that shit and can't do something as simple as link to something you believe he can't refute, and this is your reply? You've now lost all credibility. Carry on
There is no magic bullet which is why I linked him to that site. Evidence is compiled piece by piece. It's the preponderance of the evidence that matters. People like the dork I was conversing with will ALWAYS find some way to explain away evidence of fraud no matter how compelling. It's the way "skeptics" argue.
A true skeptic is open to truth and weighs each piece of evidence carefully in pursuit thereof. A clown like this guy (and you) are ready to dismiss ANYTHING and EVERYTHING put in front of them by twisting themselves into pretzels, thereby missing the forest for the trees.
My mind is made up - don't confuse me with the facts.
As I wasn't discussing this with you to begin with, your assessment of my credibility is meaningless. As you were.
(post is archived)