![Can someone with letters after their name in an appropriate field explain this shit to me please [615x717 - 115KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/g6cdcA.jpg){kind=link}
The definition sucks and the whole thing is murky as hell as far as I can tell, that's the definition though. In fact, pulled out the dictionary just now and it's even murkier because it says they're part of the same species if they can "usually interbreed" so goddamn.
The definition sucks and the whole thing is murky as hell as far as I can tell, that's the definition though. In fact, pulled out the dictionary just now and it's even murkier because it says they're part of the same species if they can "usually interbreed" so goddamn.
Then wolves and coyotes are the same species. So are cougar and leopard. So are grizzlies and polar bears. That would kind of shake up the ESA listings now wouldnt it? But no, they only make your claim when it applies to the human one race agenda, and discard it when it applies to pushing esa bullshit. Lions and tigers produce fertile offspring. Are lions and tigers the same species?
Then wolves and coyotes are the same species. So are cougar and leopard. So are grizzlies and polar bears. That would kind of shake up the ESA listings now wouldnt it? But no, they only make your claim when it applies to the human one race agenda, and discard it when it applies to pushing esa bullshit. Lions and tigers produce fertile offspring. Are lions and tigers the same species?
(post is archived)