I mean, not always.
All the Ivies are dogshit, and Stanford too, but my understanding is that, say, MIT for example, is still MIT. It's not an accident that they humiliate Harvard in the prank war every year.
The problem is that the solution to our nerds selling us down the river in an extreme dereliction of duty isn't to do away with nerds entirely. We just need better nerds, from places like MIT, U Chicago, Vanderbilt, Rice...
Similarly, HBD means BD. There are fields that are still single-digit female, and the women in those fields aren't there because of Affirmative Action, they're there because they're outliers.
And look, women's brains are definitely different. IF an outlier can hang with the boys, she really will bring observations, approaches, and thought processes to the team that they just wouldn't have access to otherwise.
The problems start when we assume that any percentage under 50 or any percentage over 0 is bullshit.
The women that belong, though, don't need any help. They're also never discussed by feminists because have no fucking clue what they're talking about.
This is an example of what I'm talking about.
https://medium.com/@maradydd/okay-feminism-its-time-we-had-a-talk-about-empathy-bd6321c66b37
(post is archived)