WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

225

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

google reverse image search

First page dates back as far as 2015 2008

Sure thing.

[–] 0 pt

I did a Google image search, max 3 days old. Link please.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

No. I'm not giving a URL with personal identifiers in it.

Learn to custom range faggot. I outlined that bit.

Here I'll help nigger;

https://i.ibb.co/z8gYpwD/image.png

[–] 0 pt

Just click the links. For example the site, https://www.dw.com/en/top-stories/science/s-12526 'Science| In-depth reporting on science and technology | DW' was first indexed 2015, but its content is from today (with the article about nanographics) and that's where Google got the picture from.

[–] 1 pt

"Photo" is misleading because a photo is made by photons, but only electrons are small enough to show the structure of a virus. With electrons, they can get slices of the virus like this: https://pic8.co/sh/5fgHiP.jpg

With many slices of the same object, they can reconstruct the 3D structore of the object. And because electrons have no color, they add some for effect. So, after all, it's not just one of the many models or artist renderings of the virus, but it is not a photograph either.

Visualization of cyro-electron tomography scan: https://nanographics.at/projects/coronavirus-3d/

[–] 0 pt

shit so if that pic is real they finally created the real coronavirus and are ready to dump it into the wild though fake vaccines?

[–] 0 pt

Let us see a real picture of the isolated virus. Ohhh...

[–] 0 pt

What are you trying to say? Do you think that's real?

[–] 0 pt

I am trying to say that the virus has not been isolated and that's why all they can come up with is fake CGI pictures of the supposed covid 19 virus.

[–] 0 pt

Okay. We're on the same page. My misunderstanding. I have a headache.