How original.
How original.
No, but I bet if you leapt off a tall structure you would start believing very quickly.
No, but I bet if you leapt off a tall structure you would start believing very quickly.
And it's not the fall that proves it. It's the sudden stop at the end that seals the deal.
And it's not the fall that proves it. It's the sudden stop at the end that seals the deal.
Lol, good one.
Lol, good one.
Don't know if this helps but is a cool nonetheless
Don't know if this helps but is a cool [video](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XRr1kaXKBsU) nonetheless
Yeah that helps a lot. He admits gravity isn't real and is just an illusion.
Yeah that helps a lot. He admits gravity isn't real and is just an illusion.
curious. what do you mean by "isn't real"
do you mean that metaphysically, like your hand isn't real?
curious. what do you mean by "isn't real"
do you mean that metaphysically, like your hand isn't real?
I mean that it doesn't exist.
I mean that it doesn't exist.
Do you think that when particularly intelligent operatives get assigned to infiltrate Poal, there's like, a Seven Stages of Grief-Posting they go through? Like, maybe this is a phase?
"I have to convince low-tier morons to spout flatearth aids, so that normies won't associate with them. I have a PhD. This is my life. This is the work my peers thought I was best-suited for. I desire only the absolution of lobotomy."
And Spry2 posts the lowest effort bullshit even imaginable, as some kind of effort-conservation gamification of his social-sabotage work?
Do you think that when particularly intelligent operatives get assigned to infiltrate Poal, there's like, a Seven Stages of Grief-Posting they go through? Like, maybe this is a phase?
"I have to convince low-tier morons to spout flatearth aids, so that normies won't associate with them. I have a PhD. This is my life. This is the work my peers thought I was best-suited for. I desire only the absolution of lobotomy."
And Spry2 posts the lowest effort bullshit even imaginable, as some kind of effort-conservation gamification of his social-sabotage work?
Is that an argument for gravity? Or do you have no argument?
You have quite the imagination.
Is that an argument for gravity? Or do you have no argument?
You have quite the imagination.
So, second question. In the FBI "Distraction Tactics" handbook, what is item two?
I mean, obviously "Item 1" is "lure people stupid enough to be absurdly drawn in defending the obvious, as if the obvious were their personal property under direct assault". But, is "Item 2" really just "Repeat previous absurd pleas to morons, and refuse to engage with anyone not draw."?
Cause that's all I see out of you people. Is there an Item 3? I want your best work. Enthrall me.
So, second question. In the FBI "Distraction Tactics" handbook, what is item two?
I mean, obviously "Item 1" is "lure people stupid enough to be absurdly drawn in defending the obvious, as if the obvious were their personal property under direct assault". But, is "Item 2" really just "Repeat previous absurd pleas to morons, and refuse to engage with anyone not draw."?
Cause that's all I see out of you people. Is there an Item 3? I want your best work. Enthrall me.
Do you have an argument or not?
Do you have an argument or not?
Go find a pack of feral niggers and wave some job applications at them. The gravity of your situation will become increasingly apparent.
Go find a pack of feral niggers and wave some job applications at them. The gravity of your situation will become increasingly apparent.
Lol
Lol
Using gravitational waves for communication. http://drrobertbaker.com/docs/com%20study%20composite%20.pdf
Using gravitational waves for communication. http://drrobertbaker.com/docs/com%20study%20composite%20.pdf
You mean electromagnetic radiation.
You mean electromagnetic radiation.
No, gravitational. The problem with comm over large distances is the time it takes. NASA would program the route and actions of the Mars rovers many hours in advance, send them out and hope they were received. I've heard it explained like a garden hose that, when new, needs time to fill with water before you get some out the other end. With gravity filling the universe, the "hose" is already full and the end result may be instantaneous.
No, gravitational. The problem with comm over large distances is the time it takes. NASA would program the route and actions of the Mars rovers many hours in advance, send them out and hope they were received. I've heard it explained like a garden hose that, when new, needs time to fill with water before you get some out the other end. With gravity filling the universe, the "hose" is already full and the end result may be instantaneous.
Do you have any experiments that I can do that proves this phenomenon is the same force that holds oceans to the bottom of the planet?
Do you have any experiments that I can do that proves this phenomenon is the same force that holds oceans to the bottom of the planet?
Woah woah woah, who downvoated this thread? Must be a triggered globetard.
Woah woah woah, who downvoated this thread? Must be a triggered globetard.
You mention up/down, but what about the planetary orbits?
Is the experiment confined to just earth?
The problem with "just earth" "proofs" are that the attraction between the earth and any object is always way greater than the attraction between two other objects. Thus leading to the fundamental experiments needing to be between the earth and something.
A better experiment would be done in a zero gravity environment, such as ISS. There two masses could be placed at a distance, but the mass of the ISS and people would influence any experiment unless the masses were larger than the ISS, which is kinda hard to get up there.
There is an interesting experiment that hypothesizes gravity isn't caused by mass, but by magnetic forces, and to prove it, they took a whole bunch of round magnets and formed a large clump. This magnetic ball did not have a north or south, and any other magnet was attracted to the center of the ball, and never repelled, no matter what pole faced the mass. This setup used the very strong magnet balls, so the forces were still considerably larger than gravity would be.
You mention up/down, but what about the planetary orbits?
Is the experiment confined to just earth?
The problem with "just earth" "proofs" are that the attraction between the earth and any object is always way greater than the attraction between two other objects. Thus leading to the fundamental experiments needing to be between the earth and something.
A better experiment would be done in a zero gravity environment, such as ISS. There two masses could be placed at a distance, but the mass of the ISS and people would influence any experiment unless the masses were larger than the ISS, which is kinda hard to get up there.
There is an interesting experiment that hypothesizes gravity isn't caused by mass, but by magnetic forces, and to prove it, they took a whole bunch of round magnets and formed a large clump. This magnetic ball did not have a north or south, and any other magnet was attracted to the center of the ball, and never repelled, no matter what pole faced the mass. This setup used the very strong magnet balls, so the forces were still considerably larger than gravity would be.
Yes, this experiment needs to be confined to earth. Otherwise we won't be able to replicate it.
I don't trust NASA. Or any authority figures, really.
If gravity were actually magnetism, wouldn't non-ferrous objects float away?
Yes, this experiment needs to be confined to earth. Otherwise we won't be able to replicate it.
I don't trust NASA. Or any authority figures, really.
If gravity were actually magnetism, wouldn't non-ferrous objects float away?
I don't know how they phrased it, but "given a big enough magnet, everything can be magnetic" or something.
Of course that magnet would be earth sized.... probably not an experiment that can be done.
The best experiment would be to get two large masses - probably a beach ball sized lead ball - weighing a ton or so each. Not too big as to be unwieldy, but big enough to have some impact on each other.
Have one held in place by a large hanging wire on the top, and then also just barely kept off of center by a load cell, that measures force on it. Have the load cell hold the weight maybe 1 degree off vertical, pulling away from from the other mass.
The second mass have on a some sort of mechanism that can effect a sudden withdrawal from the first ball, something like a huge spring, say 10 meters long.
The experiment would be to measure the force on the first ball with the load cell as the second ball is moved in closer and closer.
If gravity were a thing, then the force would change as the second ball got closer. Suppose there was a reading change at the 5cm mark.
Now use the spring to retract the second mass essentially instantaneously away from the first mass, and watch the corresponding force on the first mass.
Given a big enough mass, with a fast enough withdrawal time, there should be some sort of effect on the two masses.
Doing the experiment in a vacuum would eliminate any effects of air currents, etc.
But yeah, gravity experiments inside earth's gravity are very hard.
I don't know how they phrased it, but "given a big enough magnet, everything can be magnetic" or something.
Of course that magnet would be earth sized.... probably not an experiment that can be done.
The best experiment would be to get two large masses - probably a beach ball sized lead ball - weighing a ton or so each. Not too big as to be unwieldy, but big enough to have some impact on each other.
Have one held in place by a large hanging wire on the top, and then also just barely kept off of center by a load cell, that measures force on it. Have the load cell hold the weight maybe 1 degree off vertical, pulling away from from the other mass.
The second mass have on a some sort of mechanism that can effect a sudden withdrawal from the first ball, something like a huge spring, say 10 meters long.
The experiment would be to measure the force on the first ball with the load cell as the second ball is moved in closer and closer.
If gravity were a thing, then the force would change as the second ball got closer. Suppose there was a reading change at the 5cm mark.
Now use the spring to retract the second mass essentially instantaneously away from the first mass, and watch the corresponding force on the first mass.
Given a big enough mass, with a fast enough withdrawal time, there should be some sort of effect on the two masses.
Doing the experiment in a vacuum would eliminate any effects of air currents, etc.
But yeah, gravity experiments inside earth's gravity are very hard.
Almost sounds like the Cavendish experiment.
If the moon pulls on the tides, does it pull on anything else?
Almost sounds like the Cavendish experiment.
If the moon pulls on the tides, does it pull on anything else?
Time is a product of Gravity.
Time is a product of Gravity.
Time doesn't exist either.
Time doesn't exist either.
Shhh. You are late for work...
Shhh. You are late for work...
lol
lol
I dont understand the question.
Is there somebody denying the effort it takes to keep things upright and keep from falling?
are you trying to find the "proof" or are you coming from the perspective that the thing we experience as gravity doesn't exist.
I dont understand the question.
Is there somebody denying the effort it takes to keep things upright and keep from falling?
are you trying to find the "proof" or are you coming from the perspective that the thing we experience as gravity doesn't exist.
Let me help you. I'm looking for any experiment OTHER than the Cavendish experiment, which supposedly proves gravity is caused by mass...which should cause an attraction in directions besides up/down. (Which is easily explained by density/buoyancy.)
Let me help you. I'm looking for any experiment OTHER than the Cavendish experiment, which supposedly proves gravity is caused by mass...which should cause an attraction in directions besides up/down. (Which is easily explained by density/buoyancy.)
thanks for clarifying.
Dont think I'm anal but I want to clarify a few things.
"Gravity" is a word to describe the phenomenon
the "theories" why gravity happens, are a different matter
finally
to "prove" something true in science is an impossible axiom.
you can "proof" math but can't "prove" theories true in science. That's not how science works.
You can only prove something false.
thanks for clarifying.
Dont think I'm anal but I want to clarify a few things.
"Gravity" is a word to describe the phenomenon
the "theories" why gravity happens, are a different matter
finally
to "prove" something true in science is an impossible axiom.
you can "proof" math but can't "prove" theories true in science. That's not how science works.
You can only prove something false.
I'm just looking for an experiment that actually shows this phenomenon.
I'm just looking for an experiment that actually shows this phenomenon.
(post is archived)