WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

379

If one were in an apocalypse situation and needed to give a direct donation of blood to another, how would that be done? I'm asking about doing this in a situation where there are no hospitals, it's just the person needing blood and the person donating. You can't just insert the needle and tubing into the donator first and then the recipient, can you? Wouldn't it have to be drained into something (ideally one could get their hands on the appropriate receptacle) and then given to the person who needed it?

If one were in an apocalypse situation and needed to give a direct donation of blood to another, how would that be done? I'm asking about doing this in a situation where there are no hospitals, it's just the person needing blood and the person donating. You can't just insert the needle and tubing into the donator first and then the recipient, can you? Wouldn't it have to be drained into something (ideally one could get their hands on the appropriate receptacle) and then given to the person who needed it?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Statins - the news is out. They offer a fraction of a percentage of avoiding a heart attack.

A fraction of a percentage. Not 1% but like .7%.

Pfizer and everyone involved with Lipitor should be in prison.

I see a female doctor. She's whip smart. We just chat while she is suturing me up from a biopsy. I appreciate the dialogue and I think she does as well. Challenging questions in both directions. Good to know her.