Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

In this video we will examine the concept of free body diagrams, sometimes known as "toy models" and how these can be used for doing physics. We also learn how they cannot be used for physics, i.e., when they do not represent anything that actually exists, then they cannot model anything that exists and they will only extrapolate things which do not exist.

We also examine a sophistical rebuttal of my work from "skepticalscience", and laugh at them, and academia, for being as stupid as donkeys.

In this video we will examine the concept of free body diagrams, sometimes known as "toy models" and how these can be used for doing physics. We also learn how they cannot be used for physics, i.e., when they do not represent anything that actually exists, then they cannot model anything that exists and they will only extrapolate things which do not exist. We also examine a sophistical rebuttal of my work from "skepticalscience", and laugh at them, and academia, for being as stupid as donkeys.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] • 0 pt

https://files.catbox.moe/i4xah6.png (Fig. 2.3)

As I discussed in that debate(https://youtu.be/BzzLuTTo76k)…the main issue here is the interpretation of that downward arrow in that Figure 2.3. In climate alarm physics that arrow is interpreted as a temperature-increasing function, as a temperature-increasing mechanism. One must ask: what is the mechanism, in physics, that could perform this function? Well, we refer to the first law of thermodynamics: to increase a body’s temperature, you require work and/or heat. The scenario isn’t about work being done here, and so, the only possibility of that downward arrow to act as a temperature-increasing mechanism is if that downward arrow is heat. That downward arrow has to be heat.

However, we then must refer to the known definitions and mathematical expressions for heat – well, heat is not something that can flow from the colder atmosphere to the warmer surface. And so that downward arrow cannot be interpreted as heat. Thus there’s no way that that downward arrow could serve to increase the temperature of the warmer surface.

We should then consider that the only reason why that downward arrow is interpreted as heat by climate alarm, is because they treat the solar input as equal to the terrestrial output, at -18C or 255K. They begin their model of the climate under the premise that the sun cannot heat the Earth to above -18C…that the Sun cannot and does not create the climate or temperatures above -18C! So under that premise, they then desire to interpret that downward arrow as being able to heat the surface further even though heat could never flow in that direction.

And YES, in their peer-reviewed literature, they do indeed state and believe that the atmosphere must heat the Earth at TWICE the power and ability of the Sun. And YES, indeed, they do literally believe that the Sun DOES NOT heat the Earth or create Earth’s climate.

-Postma