WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

  • Human social strategies can be distilled into four fundamental types (Selfish, Traitorous, Humanitarian, Ethnocentric)

  • Game-theory simulation finds that the Ethnocentric strategy always wins eventually

  • The Humanitarian strategy can provide growth advantages early on, but is vulnerable to exploitation by Ethnocentrists (seem familiar?)

  • Authors do their best to sing praises of Humanitarianism, but can't argue with their own results.

    • relevant studies are listed at the bottom of this article. Original simulation was from: Hammond, R. A., & Axelrod, R. (2006b). The evolution of ethnocentrism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 926-936 (Unfortunately this seems pay-walled wherever I've looked). summarized by the article.

Whites must re-learn Ethnocentrism, or we'll be wiped out by those who never forgot it.

- Human social strategies can be distilled into four fundamental types (Selfish, Traitorous, Humanitarian, Ethnocentric) - Game-theory simulation finds that the Ethnocentric strategy always wins eventually - The Humanitarian strategy can provide growth advantages early on, but is vulnerable to exploitation by Ethnocentrists (seem familiar?) - Authors do their best to sing praises of Humanitarianism, but can't argue with their own results. [Summary Article](https://egtheory.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/how-ethnocentrics-rule/) - relevant studies are listed at the bottom of this article. Original simulation was from: Hammond, R. A., & Axelrod, R. (2006b). The evolution of ethnocentrism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 926-936 (Unfortunately this seems pay-walled wherever I've looked). [This is the paper](http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html) summarized by the article. Whites must re-learn Ethnocentrism, or we'll be wiped out by those who never forgot it.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Whites need to tell (((fellow white people))) and women to shut the fuck up.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

White is an identity mostly constructed by jews and jewish history books.

And we end up getting lumped in with the irish, notorious wife beaters, and alcoholics, and a bunch of other questionable groups like the iberians and the sicilins. And then theres the issue of the aryans? And if white = aryan, then we have to accept e.x. the iranians, and thus the semitics, and on and on and on.

It's a swamp which israelis thrive in like rats.

This crisis of being overtaken by the semitics, the jews, is really an opportunity for us to redefine who is 'white' or better yet 'european' and what that means.

I propose a retreat to saxonism, less even than angloism, as protestantism is tied at the hip primarily to the anglo half of the anglo-saxon identity, and salami sliced into twenty thousand flavors and consequently subverted by judaism where it isn't subservient to catholicism.

This also opens us up to a real reemerge of paganism, by making a clean break from the frontal-assault on all things 'white', bypassing the problems and labels of the past.

All that is not saxon is enemy, all who label us 'white' are enemy. The solution is not to admit or deny being white, but to reject it in favor of something older, and firmer, and less subverted.

This also gives us, as a demographic group, a future opportunity to fuse the saxon half of america and the west in general, tautonic as it were, into the slavic half, which will be the end of the asiatics, including the khazars/semitics as cultures in the long term.

[–] 0 pt

I'll have to think on that one. America gets hard to unwind with that definition.