You're really quite stupid aren't you? The reason you write so much while thinking so little is called the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Your cringe-worthy personal opinions aside, , and the science is as settled as we could hope for. It's all there in the IPCC reports for anyone with the ability to study independently and understand. That's not you, and sadly I don't think you can comprehend just how much more competent others are.
Sorry to be insulting, at least you won't lack friends, but you'll probably get sold a few bridges.
You don't insult someone and then apologise for it, that's just weak. I write a lot because it is a throwback to my uni days writing reports. Also, "settled science" is an oxymoron. You're a zealot, and I pity you.
Either way, I got what I was after. By your own admission, Hansen's report got it wrong. Maybe in another 30 years we can discuss the latest 2018 IPCC reports/models and talk about how those are also wrong.
I apologized because I don't mean to hurt your feelings and I know it's an awful thing to say - but I genuinely think you're not smart enough to understand the topic, and not even wise enough to follow the money and appreciate the expertise of others.
By your own admission, Hansen's report got it wrong.
He got it right in the same way we don't lose faith in the metservice if the weatherman predicts a 35 degree day and what we get is 30. But I already explained that, and many other things that I think are just beyond you.
(post is archived)