Data and objective scientific analysis. Which, when it comes to the topic of climate change, NASA seldom practices.
Data and objective scientific analysis. Which, when it comes to the topic of climate change, NASA seldom practices.
Reasonable answer, but real world data is often incomplete, and time is limited. From your previous claims it goes without saying that NASA's objective scientific analysis is far superior to yours.
Reasonable answer, but real world data is often incomplete, and time is limited. From your previous claims it goes without saying that NASA's objective scientific analysis is far superior to yours.
real world data is often incomplete, and time is limited.
This has nothing to do with NASA's practices. They are intentionally dishonest when it comes to the subject of climate change, regardless of the "completeness" of the data.
> real world data is often incomplete, and time is limited.
This has nothing to do with NASA's practices. They are intentionally dishonest when it comes to the subject of climate change, regardless of the "completeness" of the data.
You don't know they are intentionally dishonest. You're a fool who lacks basic reasoning skills. Who tells you what to believe?
You don't know they are intentionally dishonest. You're a fool who lacks basic reasoning skills. Who tells you what to believe?
(post is archived)