You don't insult someone and then apologise for it, that's just weak. I write a lot because it is a throwback to my uni days writing reports. Also, "settled science" is an oxymoron. You're a zealot, and I pity you.
Either way, I got what I was after. By your own admission, Hansen's report got it wrong. Maybe in another 30 years we can discuss the latest 2018 IPCC reports/models and talk about how those are also wrong.
I apologized because I don't mean to hurt your feelings and I know it's an awful thing to say - but I genuinely think you're not smart enough to understand the topic, and not even wise enough to follow the money and appreciate the expertise of others.
By your own admission, Hansen's report got it wrong.
He got it right in the same way we don't lose faith in the metservice if the weatherman predicts a 35 degree day and what we get is 30. But I already explained that, and many other things that I think are just beyond you.
(post is archived)