I am well aware of the various theories around 'perfect' or 'golden' numbers and 3,6,9. Unfortunately this 'article' does not actually discuss any of the theories or science. It is written with less supporting info or even explanation of the theory than and episode of Ancient Aliens. This is not science. Even Reader's Digest does a better job. It is so bad I consider it spam.
I am well aware of the various theories around 'perfect' or 'golden' numbers and 3,6,9. Unfortunately this 'article' does not actually discuss any of the theories or science. It is written with less supporting info or even explanation of the theory than and episode of **Ancient Aliens**. This is not science. Even Reader's Digest does a better job. It is so bad I consider it spam.
Lol! Ok. If that's your conclusion, then so be it. I won't argue with you. I see a valid point that can change the direction of science. It has always been a challenge to move ahead in science with previous claims. They kinda make certain movements impossible. Sometimes you have to separate yourself from previous claims in order to see a better possible theory.
Lol! Ok. If that's your conclusion, then so be it. I won't argue with you. I see a valid point that can change the direction of science. It has always been a challenge to move ahead in science with previous claims. They kinda make certain movements impossible. Sometimes you have to separate yourself from previous claims in order to see a better possible theory.
(post is archived)