WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

What you need to know in order to be relieved of the hardships caused by the 3,6,9 manifestation. YOU DON'T WANT TO PASS THIS BY!

What you need to know in order to be relieved of the hardships caused by the 3,6,9 manifestation. YOU DON'T WANT TO PASS THIS BY!

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

Wtf is this and why is it in science?

[–] 4 pts

You and I think alike.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

I tried to read it but became utterly bored. Selling fake science with sex is hawt

[–] 4 pts

I clicked to see if it really was an article about a scientific topic. I feel dumber after having read as much of it as I did.

[–] -1 pt

You're right. A lot science is boring. Lol! But many of us are interested in it, so I wouldn't talk bad about science in a science group. lol!

[–] -1 pt

It deals with the 3,6,9 manifestation and what scientists failed to notice. It's actually an interesting scientific piece.

[–] 0 pt

It is not scientific because they are not testing falsifiable claims. Moreover, it's inane bullshit.

[–] 0 pt

I understand you argument, but try growing a pair of wings and fly away from the bullshit of 3,6,9 that traps you in a triangle for all eternity.

[–] 3 pts

Down vote for being in s/science. Move to s/funny

[–] -2 pt

It isn't meant to be funny. Sorry. It is scientific in nature. It deals with the 3,6,9 manifestation and what scientists have failed to notice in their studies. Please show a little more respect to people's work, would you. Not sure where you got funny from.

[–] 0 pt

I am well aware of the various theories around 'perfect' or 'golden' numbers and 3,6,9. Unfortunately this 'article' does not actually discuss any of the theories or science. It is written with less supporting info or even explanation of the theory than and episode of Ancient Aliens. This is not science. Even Reader's Digest does a better job. It is so bad I consider it spam.

[–] 0 pt

Lol! Ok. If that's your conclusion, then so be it. I won't argue with you. I see a valid point that can change the direction of science. It has always been a challenge to move ahead in science with previous claims. They kinda make certain movements impossible. Sometimes you have to separate yourself from previous claims in order to see a better possible theory.