You don't need to understand the detailed science. Just look at the predictions that have been made over the past 35 years. The arctic ice was meant to disappear by 2000 for example. Instead of exponentially increasing temperatures we have had a flatline/pause for over 15 years.
Any hypothesis that generally makes incorrect predictions is bogus and invalid. There is also the widespread fraudulent readjustment of measured temperature data to create fake warming trends, which wouldn't be needed with a credible theory.
wattsupwiththat.com has relevant articles. Some are quite technical but others describe the frauds or failed predictions with simple graphs.
You don't need to understand the detailed science. Just look at the predictions that have been made over the past 35 years. The arctic ice was meant to disappear by 2000 for example. Instead of exponentially increasing temperatures we have had a flatline/pause for over 15 years.
Any hypothesis that generally makes incorrect predictions is bogus and invalid. There is also the widespread fraudulent readjustment of measured temperature data to create fake warming trends, which wouldn't be needed with a credible theory.
wattsupwiththat.com has relevant articles. Some are quite technical but others describe the frauds or failed predictions with simple graphs.
(post is archived)