WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

790

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

In Study 5, we show that a specific dimension of Machiavellianism—amoral manipulation—and a form of narcissism that reflects a person’s belief in their superior prosociality predict more frequent virtuous victim signaling. Studies 3, 4, and 6 test our hypothesis that the frequency of emitting virtuous victim signal predicts a person’s willingness to engage in and endorse ethically questionable behaviors,

So in short, jews.

controlling for demographic and socioeconomic variables that are commonly associated with victimization in Western societies.

“But we don’t want to learn too much today!”

[–] 0 pt

I can try to pretend it's only jews, but large segments of Whites act in that way. There are a lot of spiteful mutants.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Yeah its not. I have a whole theory about their origin and and genetic selection process. Basically I think they were originally a bunch pagan priests living in mesopotamia who began intermarrying. Every trait they have makes sense in that context. High literacy, penchant for the law and bureacracy, but also high social manipulation skills, performance skills, ability to develop narratives, and the constant tendency to scam money off the flock. Think televangelists circa the bronze age. Over the millenia theyve found similar parasitic niches to exploit which play to their strengths— manipulation of cultural information — to exist. They rarely are employed in an endeavor that directly produces real wealth. They always scam off the bureacracy because they are parasites of others’ societies. Other people are truly their livestock.

They were originally recruited from a normal population though— those exploitive genes exist in lower frequencies in other groups. But they concentrated in that group, as well as in gypsies and irish travellers, and perhaps in some other groups like european nobility. Any time you get an endogamous group that lives off other people, these traits can be “bred” for. Animals will evolve to more efficiently exploit any niche after several generations.

The thing with jews is that there is likely to be some “good jews” in any generation—ones that are less exploitive— but they tend to drop out. Jews occassionally recruit goyim with the “right stuff” in a jewish context, e.g. The Clintons. So you can see how after about 4000 years they are highly perfected parasites, on average.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

This make a ton of sense. And, add to that that in jews the female is dominant and the male submissive.

All jewish male fight (and strategize) exclusively using female social warfare techniques. Jewish males never fight for dominance in male hierarchy using physicality or normal tests of competence, it's always subterfuge.

The other thing that I have noticed is that they have exagerated genetic expression in weird ways. So, they are submissive in their species but hyper sexualized, hyper verbal and hyper focused on abstract symbolic representation.

When you watch any conversation between jews it's like watching a bizarro world autistic child that has some fairly substantial compromizes psychologically in exchange for other higher functions that don't make sense in any way except specific natural selection for survival traits as per your model.