https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-46166-001
Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of Dark Triad personalities
We investigate the consequences and predictors of emitting signals of victimhood and virtue. In our first three studies, we show that the virtuous victim signal can facilitate nonreciprocal resource transfer from others to the signaler. Next, we develop and validate a victim signaling scale that we combine with an established measure of virtue signaling to operationalize the virtuous victim construct. We show that individuals with Dark Triad traits—Machiavellianism, Narcissism, Psychopathy—more frequently signal virtuous victimhood, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic variables that are commonly associated with victimization in Western societies. In Study 5, we show that a specific dimension of Machiavellianism—amoral manipulation—and a form of narcissism that reflects a person’s belief in their superior prosociality predict more frequent virtuous victim signaling. Studies 3, 4, and 6 test our hypothesis that the frequency of emitting virtuous victim signal predicts a person’s willingness to engage in and endorse ethically questionable behaviors, such as lying to earn a bonus, intention to purchase counterfeit products and moral judgments of counterfeiters, and making exaggerated claims about being harmed in an organizational context.
In Study 5, we show that a specific dimension of Machiavellianism—amoral manipulation—and a form of narcissism that reflects a person’s belief in their superior prosociality predict more frequent virtuous victim signaling. Studies 3, 4, and 6 test our hypothesis that the frequency of emitting virtuous victim signal predicts a person’s willingness to engage in and endorse ethically questionable behaviors,
So in short, jews.
controlling for demographic and socioeconomic variables that are commonly associated with victimization in Western societies.
“But we don’t want to learn too much today!”
I can try to pretend it's only jews, but large segments of Whites act in that way. There are a lot of spiteful mutants.
Yeah its not. I have a whole theory about their origin and and genetic selection process. Basically I think they were originally a bunch pagan priests living in mesopotamia who began intermarrying. Every trait they have makes sense in that context. High literacy, penchant for the law and bureacracy, but also high social manipulation skills, performance skills, ability to develop narratives, and the constant tendency to scam money off the flock. Think televangelists circa the bronze age. Over the millenia theyve found similar parasitic niches to exploit which play to their strengths— manipulation of cultural information — to exist. They rarely are employed in an endeavor that directly produces real wealth. They always scam off the bureacracy because they are parasites of others’ societies. Other people are truly their livestock.
They were originally recruited from a normal population though— those exploitive genes exist in lower frequencies in other groups. But they concentrated in that group, as well as in gypsies and irish travellers, and perhaps in some other groups like european nobility. Any time you get an endogamous group that lives off other people, these traits can be “bred” for. Animals will evolve to more efficiently exploit any niche after several generations.
The thing with jews is that there is likely to be some “good jews” in any generation—ones that are less exploitive— but they tend to drop out. Jews occassionally recruit goyim with the “right stuff” in a jewish context, e.g. The Clintons. So you can see how after about 4000 years they are highly perfected parasites, on average.
(post is archived)