WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Then the /Qtard sub has been made specially for you, you'd need never leave, everything in there is gloriously fact free, unverified and unsourced.

Any OP with a drooling frog logo is 100% certified correct about everything, Poal can do all the thinking for you, leaving you free to confirm all your biases and always feel content that you are the only one who knows the Truth

[–] 0 pt

Not a Qtard, and I’m not saying this post is true, but the site you linked literally fact checked that nine pages of a Pfizer document listing thousands of vaccine-related side effects does NOT exist, because the document actually calls them “adverse events,” not side effects.

Your source is bullshit

[–] 0 pt

Not a Qtard

doubt.

you didn't bother to go and verify yourself, and you came up with another random tinfoil without checking either.

stop doing this, you are wasting everyone's time

I’m not saying this post is true

good

they have a bank there... https://www.factcheck.org/2022/03/rothschild-co-has-office-in-russia-contrary-to-conspiracy-claim-on-social-media/

other sources: https://news.knowledia.com/US/en/articles/rothschild-and-co-has-office-in-russia-contrary-to-conspiracy-claim-on-9b297000d2798128a69d0950d807ab5ca80e3c4d https://www.vishwadha.news/no-evidence-putin-banned-rothschild-family-from-russia/ https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/03/03/fact-check-no-evidence-putin-banned-rothschild-family-russia/6979745001/ https://edmo.eu/2022/02/28/war-in-ukraine-the-fact-checked-disinformation-detected-in-the-eu/ https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/06/fact-check-putin-did-not-ban-rothschilds-from-russia.html

but the site you linked literally fact checked that nine pages of a Pfizer document listing thousands of vaccine-related side effects does NOT exist, because the document actually calls them “adverse events,” not side effects.

Yes because everything is reported in those. If I get a jab and the next day my big toe aches, it goes in the report. If someone notices that everyone is getting achy toes after the jab THEN they can start a verifiable investigation into toe pain. That's the whole point of collecting unverified data

Anyone with internet access can add a report to the VAERS list of reports.

the list only provides a tally of unverified notes about any health event people experience after they are vaccinated. You are not supposed to draw conclusions from that, it's a starting point for other studies, not an end report in itself.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Yeah, keep telling yourself that VAERS aren’t side effects. Literally nobody said that before fact checkers had to shill for a vaccine.

And feel free to go through my history to try to prove that I’m a Qtard the same way you dug through that retarded website just to spout its own words as proof that it’s accurate. You’re wrong on both

[–] 0 pt

You can dispute ideas and information without saying "fact check". I can write an article saying "fact check, you're a nigger" but it doesn't mean it's true, it just means I'm trying to make you think I have some authority.

[–] 0 pt

You can dispute ideas and information without saying "fact check"

If you like, but it's not relevant to anything? note that I only said "fake", I'm not responsible for the wording of the URL

I can write an article saying "fact check, you're a nigger" but it doesn't mean it's true

And people can verify if it is true or not by looking for anyone else making the same statement, if they don't find anyone else then it is possibly false, if they do find second references then its validity can be gauged on who is making the claims. Nothing can ever be proven true (except maths), but we can't keep going round in circles with drooling flat earthers just because every scientist "could" technically be an alien lizard overlord...