There is no contradiction. Your study looks at the effectiveness of two NPIs, mine looks at eight, including the two in your study. The two in your study and the two of the eight in my study both reached the same conclusion FOR THOSE TWO. However the other six, which are all NPIs involved in a lockdown, we’re found to be effective. Therefore lockdowns are effective. The infection rate data from all countries or states that have imposed lockdowns also support these findings. That’s it. End of story. If you’ve got any thing else to raise feel free to raise it, but don’t forget to be specific, clear and concise when making whatever point you’re raising, because all I’m getting from you currently is ambiguity and haziness.