Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

950

Christian weakness is being so gullible and naive as to allow jews to infilitrate your ranks because they're totally 'converts'.

christian weakness stands no chance in the age of globalism.

christian morality is good within a closed off society, but it too easily allows others to walk all over you.

hitler had it right when he tried to use christianity as one piece of a puzzle to form a racially motivated ideology and destiny.

christian weakness is aiding other races.

before christian morality, whites dominated the world. since then, we've lost the middle east, north india, north africa, and the mudbloods have crept into greece and italy and spain and left their dirt brown genes in us. low iq retards were easily beating us in the spread of genes because they had a dominant and aggressive ideology whilst we languished under a submissive ideology. our superior intellect saved us just in time for us to spread all over the world thanks to new technologies.. and what do we do? we give all those advantages to the animal races and try to help them based on complete delusions.

christianity has put non-stop hurdles in front of whites whilst every other race has played to win. it's only because every other race is so abysmally inferior that they still haven't gotten ahead of us, but now that jews have acquired our blue eyed white aryan genetics and filled their elite with that brand, they are dominating us. they stand zero chance against rome, but against christianity, we are sheep to the slaughter.

Christian weakness is being so gullible and naive as to allow jews to infilitrate your ranks because they're totally 'converts'. christian weakness stands no chance in the age of globalism. christian morality is good within a closed off society, but it too easily allows others to walk all over you. hitler had it right when he tried to use christianity as one piece of a puzzle to form a racially motivated ideology and destiny. christian weakness is aiding other races. before christian morality, whites dominated the world. since then, we've lost the middle east, north india, north africa, and the mudbloods have crept into greece and italy and spain and left their dirt brown genes in us. low iq retards were easily beating us in the spread of genes because they had a dominant and aggressive ideology whilst we languished under a submissive ideology. our superior intellect saved us just in time for us to spread all over the world thanks to new technologies.. and what do we do? we give all those advantages to the animal races and try to help them based on complete delusions. christianity has put non-stop hurdles in front of whites whilst every other race has played to win. it's only because every other race is so abysmally inferior that they still haven't gotten ahead of us, but now that jews have acquired our blue eyed white aryan genetics and filled their elite with that brand, they are dominating us. they stand zero chance against rome, but against christianity, we are sheep to the slaughter.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] • 0 pt

What I'm saying is the Mongols weren't intellectual or societal midgets. They innovated and created the most technologically advanced and safest society on the planet until that point in time.

The brownies for their part had the richest Royal courts in their day. They were defeated through infighting and lack of solidarity.

The same thing that brought more than one European power down.

You're making it sound like Europeans were solely done in by Christianity. I think there's more to it. Also, the invader genes live on in the actions of browns. Go there today and you'll find many agree 100% with the NatSoc program. Whites are just guilted into losing there nativist mentality or have lost the nationalist fervor through deliberate demoralization and indoctrination.

I wouldn't worry though. There's a way back. They wouldn't have to go to such extremes if there wasn't. 2nd amendment, and community are your friends.

[–] • 0 pt

"They innovated and created the most technologically advanced and safest society on the planet until that point in time. "

lmao. you fell for the 'every civilisation is suuper duper except for whites!'

in reality the mongols were absolute savages. they slaughtered about 2 million people in one indian city for example. every good thing they had was given to them by others, they invented nothing and contributed nothing except wholesale slaughter. they only created safe passage through a top down system of fear, and it was only because they formed one big empire, rather than having constant fractured states with barbarian raiding parties in-between. they didn't civilise the lands into a safe haven, they just slaughtered those raiding parties into less significance.

[–] • 0 pt

You're thinking of the Mughals. They, you're right, slaughtered Hindus until the rivers ran red.

The Mongols on the other hand built the silk road, and killed the least number of people possible too build their empire.

[–] • 0 pt

ah, no, i'm not. you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.